Whether contract labour should be any qualification and age relaxation
Sir,
A couple want to divorce, but the marriage was done on April-2018, and under which section for suitable for get divorce within 1 year not completed.
Pls suggest and reffer me citation.
Dear Members,
Assessee is an employee of Goverment of India Enterprise for last 37 years and still serving in the said sector, He is regularly filing his Return of Income by showing income under the head salary,
Annual Salary of Assessee Total Income (after deduction Under Chapter VI-A) as per Form 16 comes to the tune of Rs.7,98,270.
Assessee was in receipt of notice U/s.143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding cash deposit during demonetization period F.Y.2016-17 showing cash deposited during demonetization period Rs. 12,47,500.
You are requested to guide me that a Salaried Employee of Government of India can maintain cash on hand and can a Assessing Officer treat his cash on hand as Income From Undisclosed Source of Income
we are planning to buy a agriculture land from farmers but there are total 10 names but there are 2 minor girls in the list. so can we do register banakhat with them without order of District court?
they have applied for natural guardian but they want to do banakhat before the DC order. so i want to know is it possible?
Understand from reliable sources that a member who has more than two children cannot contest the election and/or join Managing Committee in the Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., Maharashtra. Is there any exemption for this rule?
Thank you with regards
Roland Noronha
my question is regarding provision, law existing clarity.
if a victim is in position of evidence then law empowers him/her to do whatever he/she wants without moving to police, court. or law empowers to do whatever he/she wants without moving to legal authority and taking law himself in hand or it is legal to do without informing anybody. or what is law please consider case to be any little or high serious or any crime whatsoever.
Meri sister bina bataye ghar se chali gayi uske baad humne use sabhi jagah talash kiya relation and hum uske jitne friend ko jante the waha par bhi talash kiya but wah kahi nahi mili Then 12 hours ke baad humne complain register karwaya and sak ke aadhar par ek ladake ka naam jisse wah mobile par bat karti thi uska namm darz karwaya aur police officer ne sec 363 ipc ka Fir darz kiya hai.
But complain register karwane ke 8 hours. Ke baad uski friend(school friend jiske baare me humko nahi pata tha)ke wahha se pata chala ki meri sister wahi Par hai.Then mai apni sister ko lekar Police station par gaya and complain return lene ko kaha par ab police officer bol rahe ki complain wapas nahi hoga aur meri sister ko apni custody me le liya aur bole ki ab medical and magistrate ke samne statement hoga .
Aur mere upar bhi action lenge kyoki maine sak ke aadhar par ek ladke ka namm darz karaya hai.
so sir iska solution kya hai?and my question is-
1-kya complain wapas ho sakta hai aur police station me hi settlement ho sakata hai?
2-kya mere upar koi case banta hai kyoki maine kisi ladake ka naam diya hai?
Sir iska kya solution hai kyoki mai LAw ke bare me jayada information nahi hai.
Please help me.
Thank you.
I am a senior citizen of about 70 years and have been falsely made as one of the respondents (R-3) in a d/v case. The purpose is to harass me and get easy money by Opposite Party.
As far the D/V case is concerned, the d/v case is clearly time-barred as per S-468 CrPC and as per case laws/precedents. So also there are proofs like Police Control Room Report that the complainant lady was kept under captivity by her parents and indoctrinated to launch lucrative “d/v business”. As such I filed a case in the High Court for quashing by the high court the d/v case (pending in the family court). Factually, adjournment-after-adjournment are given. As defined in S-37 Specific Relief Act, I was 'enjoined from the assertion of my right' and peaceful life and I am deliberately being harassed by calling to the court now and then to extract money at this age. I hope I have delivered the goods for the purpose of queries:
QUERY -1:
[With regard to privilege for senior citizens]
---------------------------------------------------------
Will I be able to approach Supreme Court, DIRECTLY INSTEAD OF DIVISION BENCH, by way of SLP against an order of the single judge of the high court which adjourned the said d/v case for a date after 6 months from now.
Incidentally, in yet another civil (employment) matter, BEING A SENIOR CITIZEN, I was successful in getting a direction from the Apex Court asking the High Court to dispose of the said matter within 3 months. Can I apply the same route here.
QUERY-2:
With regard to lower court matter
--------------------------------------------
Usually courts grant injunction NOT beyond 6 months of the lower courts. Whether further injunction is granted on the expiry of the initial 6 months which I do not know.
Hope experts will be kind enough to give their considered guidance to enable me to decide the next course of action.
Justification for posting as anonymous: Because there is a possibility that the Opp.Party may see the source of query.
Thank you in anticipation.
Settlement deed was registered as irrevocable. It was revoked after one year. In the Deed for Revocation, it was stated, the subject property was not in the settled persons use, settlees did not accept the settlement; in truth the property is in the hands of one of person named in the settlement deed for more than 15 years, where he is running a business for his living. Six persons were named in the settlement deed. Three brothers did not accept this revocation. Original is in the father's (Settler) possession. What we have to do? It was done unilaterally by the settler. Is there any remedy? The Sub-registrar's office is in Tamilnadu. Thanks Experts in advance.
Query regarding execution of money decree
I AM A GOVT SERVANT AND MY MY APPEAL IN HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT ADMITTED AT ITS OWN TURN. BUT EXECUTION COURT ADJ( DISTRICT) IN EXECUTION ISSUED A WARRANT OF ARREST UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 37 CPC THROUGH SHO CONCERNED, WITHOUT RECEIVING ANY KIND OF NOTICE REGARDING EXECUTION AND BEFORE THIS THE DEDUCTION FROM SALARY WAS DENIED BY THE EMPLOYER AS 2 DECREES ARE ALREADY BEING DEDUCTED
SO WHAT CAN I DO NOW, I MEAN I DONT WANT ARREST.
ACTUALLY ONE OF THE 2 DECREES THAT AE BEING DEDUCTED FROM SALARIES IS HAVING CONSIDERABLY LESS AMOUNT IF THERE IS NO OPTION LEFT THEN WHAT CAN I DO FOR EXAMPLE- PAYING ONE OF THE DECREE AND START SALARY DEDUCTION OF THE NEW ONE
SO WHAT CAN BE DONE THE BEST AS MY APPEAL IS ALREADY ADMITTED IN HON'BLE HIGH COURT.
AND I HAVE ALSO TO FILE OBJECTIONS..... PL SIR