Respected experts
Private trust engaged in microfinance at Tamil Nadu(target customers are lower income people) wants to develop secured loan product. they wants to lend against LIC bonds, savings bond etc., Is there any legal requirements to be satisfied by the trust to carry out this type of lending? I would be very thankful if anyone would guide me in this regard..
Thanks in advance..
Dear friends,
Is Power Of Attorney Registration is mandatory? In the contest of,
1)The SC judgment AIR 1979 SC 533 Of "Sayed Abdul Kader Vs Rami reddy", Judgment dated:29/11/1978.
2)The Indian Evidence Act- sec 85.
What is the difference between Authentication & Registration?
If SRO is not willing to register/authenticate the GPA, can i Notarise the Document (GPA)?.How it is viewed in the EYE of Law? I mean is it Valid in view of LAW?
I request Expert of the Forum to clarify my doubt.I am from Andhra Pradesh State.
What is the difference Between Authentication & Registration.
Further in A P , For Family members stamp duty (FOR G P A ) is Rs.1000/- only.
If S R O refuse to Authentication / Registration , What alternatives, I have?
Can i use this G P A ( Without Authentication & Registration), For issuing Notices and approach Court for taking legal action, against parties/Personals.
I need URGENT solution to this problem please.
Thanking you with regards.
Whether a lawyer employed by an LPO firm can give legal advice ? (Even if he has suspended his enrolment with the bar council)
Though a lawyer who's surrendered his enrolment, cannot practice law before a court, would he still be eligible to render legal advice ?
Also please tell me, whether a LPO (Legal Process Outsourcing)Firm, which employs hundreds of lawyers, can give free legal aid to the people ?
I need legal authority/precedent with regard to this.
Respected Experts and Seniors.
In a trial under N.I.Act, I am appearing on behalf of the Accused. I have taken a defence plea that the complaint is premature and is liable to be dismissed.
In the present case the complainant has avered in the complaint that he had send the notice by registered post with A/D. But neither the A/D nor the postal cover has been received by him and he has lodged a complaint before the Postal Authorities.
The complainant amongst other document has exhibited the Notice and the letter (complaint to te Postal Authorities).
Pls note that the notice is dated 06.09.08 and the postal complaint is dated 25.09.09. It is pertinent to mention here that in the letter dated 25.09.08 the complainant has categorically stated that the letter has not yet been served on the accused. The complaint has been filed on 04.10.2009.
Please bear in mind the dates.
My query is : Whether the complaint has been filed prematurely.
Respected Experts and Seniors.
In a trial under N.I.Act, I am appearing on behalf of the Accused. I have taken a defence plea that the complaint is premature and is liable to be dismissed.
In the present case the complainant has avered in the complaint that he had send the notice by registered post with A/D. But neither the A/D nor the postal cover has been received by him and he has lodged a complaint before the Postal Authorities.
The complainant amongst other document has exhibited the Notice and the letter (complaint to te Postal Authorities).
Pls note that the notice is dated 06.09.08 and the postal complaint is dated 25.09.09. It is pertinent to mention here that in the letter dated 25.09.08 the complainant has categorically stated that the letter has not been served on the accused and the complaint has been filed on 04.10.2009.
Please bear in mind the dates.
My query is : Whether the complaint has been filed prematurely.
Respected Experts and Seniors.
In a trial under N.I.Act, I am appearing on behalf of the Accused.
In the present case the complainant has avered in the complaint that he had send the notice by registered post with A/D. But neither the A/D nor the postal cover has been received by him and he has lodged a complaint before the Postal Authorities.
The complainant amongst other document has exhibited the Notice and the letter (complaint to te Postal Authorities.
Pls note that the notice is dated 06.09.08 and the postal complaint is dated 25.09.09. It is pertinent to mention here that in the letter dated 25.09.08 the complainant has categorically stated that the letter has not been served on the accused and the complaint has been filed on 04.10.2009.
Please bear in mind the dates.
My query is : Whether the complaint has been filed prematurely.
I am KOUSTHUBHA.M.R. i finished my LLB in Mysore university.. now at the time of enrollment i want to change my name... can i do that? if yes,how?
I'm from Delhi. I've cases against me in Kolkata courts by my wife. She filed a maintenance case under CRPC 125 in Kolkata and took ex-parte order for Rs. 5000 pm one and a half year back. Then, she got an ex-parte final order for Rs. 7000 pm against me again. I put a petition in time and got the final order of Rs. 7000 pm vacated and hearing is on. Now, I did not know about this interim maintenance. Now, my wife is trying to recover that money thru the same court which had ordered this amount.
I WISH TO KNOW IF THERE IS ANYTHING LIKE "AS THE MAIN CASE HAS BEEN VACATED THE INTERIM ORDER STANDS CANCELLED AUTOMATICALLY."
If there is any such reference of any case, kindly let me know. I will be very grateful.
Regards
Ashish
As per sac. 2 (J) sub cl. 4 a trust is not governed by the ID Act. However, as per the Bangalore Water supply & Sewerage Board, & Ors. a charitable institution who only gives grants is governed under the ID Act.
What has to be considered, the Act or the judgment?
My query is, I am working for a charitable institution which grants to other NGOs or Trust. We have certain employees who do the field work. All employees are paid as per the payment of wages Act. We are also given leave as per the Act. We are also governed under the Employees Provident Fund Act.
In such a situation are we governed by the ID Act. If so can you please give me the relevant Jugment other than the Bangalore Water supply. As this judgment was of 1978, the Act is still not amended.
Its very urgent.
Tips for arguing the case
If any Petitioner-in-person/advocate wants to argue the case Please inform what parameters should keep in mind for arguing the case?
In othyer words what should one kept in mind such as His petition , reply,rejoinder etc he should argue of what kept in records or may give up his opinion etc
Regards