LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Perumal Prabhu   13 October 2009 at 17:17

casual

Sir please give me a Solution on the issue mentioned bellow

In connection with an agreement two tenderes has submitted their tender documents after the clousere time (delayed tender).As per our tender conditions Lat/Delayed tender and tender offers, received through post after the time of closing of receipt of tender documents, will be summarily rejected. I would like to brig to your notice that the delayed tender is not sent through post but is was submitted in person. The tender documents are not accepted by the tender committee and the same are not opened and the same are kept as it is. Now the tenderers are demanding for relese of the EMD and tender cost.
In these circumstances what will be the appropriate step to resove the above issue
1. Can we open the teneder cover and release the EMD
2. or can we send the tender documents to the tenderers without opening the cover
3. can we release the tender cost

Sachin Bhatia   13 October 2009 at 16:47

G.K. For Experts

Ques. Which court has jurisdiction to decide a dispute between Central Government and a State Government?


Ans- Supreme Court under article 131 of the Constitution of India.


Ques. Salaries of the Supreme Court Judges are drawn from ???


Ans- Consolidated fund of india


Ques. Who is the new Chairman of Law Commission ???


Ans- A.R.Lakshman



Ques. How many High Courts are there in india???


Ans- 21 high courts

Ramesh   13 October 2009 at 15:19

G P A Validity.

Dear friends,

In the instance case , on the death of person i had taken copy of the WILL of MR. X, from a SRO office (who had died in the year 2004 ) in Aug' 2009 . In the same SRO office same SRO still allows the GPA*(This *G P A is NOT irrevocable, IE not given against consideration) given by Late Mr.X for registering some property. Can i question the same? Because of some problem i am not in a position to Question the same immediately. Is it valid under the LAW?

Thanking you all in advance.

yeteendra naidu   13 October 2009 at 14:20

deliberate & inordinate delay in transfering shares & plot

despite repeated applications for transferring the shares & plot of the deceased member of a co-op society
office-bearers/officials deliberately
delayed the transfer & registration for more than a decade, though there was not any stay
from any court. They have not even bothered
to communicate with the applicant-nominees
for over a decade. Under the circumstances
please advise what action legally can be
initiated on the erring office-bearers/officials of the society who failed to discharge their duties due to which we have suffered a lot as we could not avail
a housing loan & construct a house so as to generate rental income out of the house.now that i am retired not even eligible for a house loan. could not send children abroad for higher studies for want of property papers, and forced to live in a rented house draining out whatever meagre pension that i earn.
please suggest a way to teach the concerned a lesson so that they will not
play with the lives of the others like me.

ERiju   13 October 2009 at 14:10

Gold ornaments with husband

My ornaments are with husband. Currently , case is on. Kindly let me know what evidences are required to get back my gold. And how to get those help?

Aashish Satpute.   13 October 2009 at 12:15

other

hello,from which site i get free latest judgements given by SC and HC...?

BHUPAL SINGH   13 October 2009 at 12:07

LIMITATION ACT : AFTER HOW MANY YRS DECREE BEOCMES VOID

Dear Sirs, 13 Oct 2009

Please ref to my query dated 10 Oct 2009.
Can some learned lawyer quote the Sec of the Limitation Act under which the Decree becomes non-enforceable ( i.e. void ) after 12 yrs, if mutation process is NOT carried out by then.

With regards,

Major Bhupal Singh ( retd.),
Australia

Raja Rajeswari S   13 October 2009 at 12:05

Company Law - deposits

A private limited Co. has got unsecured loans from the its shareholders? S. 3(1)(iii) prohibits a private co. from accepting deposits from public other than its shareholders, directors or their relatives. Does the word relative mean the relative of shareholder too? If not does the above co. violate the s. 3(1)(iii)?

nuzhat. mehboob. shaikh   13 October 2009 at 12:02

drafting

i want to learn criminal drafting and from where will i get the model format of bail application, surety application, refund application, return of property application, and vakalatnama as i have enrolled this year.

gunjan aggarwal   13 October 2009 at 12:01

jurisdiction of courts under wards & guardian act 1890

i am fighting a custody case with my wife of my daughter of age 4yrs and10 months old now.my wife left me and my daughter on 27.10.2007 and on 4.8.2008 she abducted the child directly from the school in delhi afer a gap of 10 months with her to her parents house in ghaziabad.since she is getting treatment of manic depression from july 2006 so i first requested her through emails and various other channels to return the child so that she can attend the school in delhi but since she does not listen and never replyed to my various emails and legal notice i was forced to file a custody case in delhi courts in oct 2008.my wife is doing two jobs and her house in ghaziabad has a boys hostel on two floors and various other commercial activities run by her parents .my wife has no time for the child and she is a professional lady doing two jobs.she has denied all these in his ws before the court and i have submitted photographs and other proofs to prove my points.now her lawyer is saying that delhi courts has no jurisdiction to hear this case since the child is living in ghaziabad.but since this is a forcefull abduction from my custody in delhi and the child was studing in delhi school for the last two yrs and her name is in ration card of delhi and above all her mother is still filling her latest income tax and TDS returns from my delhi address and she has bought a car which is also registered in delhi and she is daily coming to delhi for attending her office and has denied all this .pls advice me on the jurisdiction issue of delhi courts in this matter.is it so easy to change the jurisdiction of the case since the cause of this custody case was the abduction of minor on 4.8.2008 by her was in delhi only and my daughter was residing in delhi by birth and i have filled the case in 2 months time after the abduction and she just want to waiste time in this matter .thanks