u/s 385/384/354

She stated in her cross examination

It is wrong to suggest that the
complaint made by me against

accused is false or by way of cheating
has been made. It is wrong to suggest
that contents of the complaint
are all false.
It is wrong to
suggest that I had admitted that
my complaint was false or I
wrote letter to Shri V. S. Chauhan
to Sr. PA DAG Administration
confessing the same on 20/4/05
or that I sent said letter after
signing to V.S. Chauhan. I do
not admit signature on Mark
A at point A.

It is wrong to
suggest that I had written any letter to Senior DAG (Admn) addressing to him and that very letter bears the signatures of two witnesses nor I had written second letter to Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. to Senior DAG (Admn) nor I had showed any apology against the provision that I had furnished in the FIR being the same falsely leveled against the accused nor I have never disclosed the facts of these two letters to my husband being the same letter not written by me to any officer.

It is wrong to suggest that I had made complaints on two occasions on

20.4.2005 against my husband in writing to my officers. It is correct that I had made these two aforesaid complaints against my husband to the Chowki In charge R.K. Puram, Sector-4, New Delhi affiliated to PS R.K. Puram, New Delhi. It is correct that I had made these complaints in the month of April 2004. Again said, Sorry, in the year 2005


This letter she wrote to her office on 20.4.2005

Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.

Sd/-
20/4/2005
Dated: 20.4.2005 (Asha Arya)


To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
- DW8 Shri Chaman Bhandari s/o Late P.S. Bhandari, Sr. A.O., AG (Audit) AGCR

on SA

The statement submitted by Smt. Asha Arya in the office of AG (Audit), Delhi is true attested copy of the original as per our office record. This statement was attested by me as true within the capacity of Sr. Audit Officer. The statement is Marked as Mark A.

Xxx By Ld. APP for the State

I do not know as to who had asked about the same information but I submitted the same as part of the record of the office. I know the complainant for about 4-5 years since she was working in the same office. I do have interaction with her as office colleague. I do not know about the behaviour of complainant. It is wrong to suggest that I am deposing falsel


And This is the second letter she wrote to her office authority with two witnesses.

To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
New Delhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.

Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05

2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05

“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..

- Above letter submitted byMr.V.S.Chauhan PW-6 on 1.12.2008 at the time of his cross examinatiion– marked as Mark ‘Z’

DW4 Shri J.B. Gupta, Sr. AO, AGCR,
On SA

I identify my signature on Ex. DW4/A at point ‘A’

xxxx by Ld APP to state

I became witness to said document at instance of Asha Arya who had signed the same in my presence. I cannot say that the said document was got forcibly signed by Asha Arya.

DW5 Shri Jawahar Lal Sr. AO (Admn.), AGCR,

on SA

I identify my signatures on Ex DW4/A at point ‘B’ . The same was signed by Asha Arya in my presence.

Xxxxx by Ld APP to state -

It is wrong to suggest that Ex PW4/A was got forcibly signed by Asha Arya. I know Asha Arya as she was working in my office. I had witnessed the said document at instance of Asha Arya. V. S. Chauhan was also working in the office. It is wrong to suggest that I signed the said document under pressure of V.S.Chauhan

Please guide me on the above facts I won tghe case or not.

Maintainance under Hindu marriage act

Wife is prof qualified and is earning but she is earning much less than her husband. Can she claim any maintainence or alimony from her husband in case of divorce. If yes, under which act and under which section/ case law. Please advise in detail.

related to municipality

could any one tell me that if a show cause notice is served to a wrong person would that be sufficient or can it be taken as a plea that it has been served to a wrong person actual position is that some repair works were going on in a land the municipal authorities have served a notice to the real sister of the perso to whom the land actually belongs what can be done please help

Help required to recover dues from company

Senior citizen maintenance Act 2007

Sir
I need a suggestion that if a senior citizen widow signed a compromise decree in the court under undue influence exerted by one of her sons and under which her right to stay in the deceased husband's property has been withdrawn. Is there any provision under the above act or any other provision which can save her right to stay in the same property.

Rule 3 Order 23 of CPC

Sir
I need a suggestion if a appeal for challenging compromise decree under the above said rule or section is made then what are the main factors to be taken into consideration for getting the appeal to set aside the said compromise which was signed in the court and whether medical grounds can be used for showing that decree was entered under undue influence or the pressure exerted by the other party who had lodged false police complaints against us which were subsequently withdrawn after the compromise was signed or is there any other provision under CPC to set aside or challenge the compromise decree.

difference b/w regularisation and reinstatement

In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter

difference b/w regularisation and reinstatement

In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter

Decleration of asset by Judges

Is the act of Disclosing their Assets Publically by some of the judges is Justified When Such A matter has created disputes in the country and the matter has been getting some luke warm responses.

Three sentences for getting success

a) know more than others.
b) work more than others
C) expect less then others...