O. Mahalakshmi
30 September 2009 at 10:16
Dear Sirs,
I have a doubt reguarding property shares of my friend.
The Dispute is:
There is A,B & C brothers these three are belongs to Fisher Man community. So A & B went to Boats for fishing and get much money and they got six boats on their names equally. But C is maintaining the boats and C who is maintaining boats with ill intension some more property (means 2 Barges which costs about Rs.50,00,000) get registered on his name to avoid shares to "A" particularly and "B" is supporting "C" in all maters. Now "A" is became old aged person and he can not go to Police Station and Court. His Grand son wants to Police Station and Court. So Can 'C's Grand son can get shares in Property which is not on his Grand Fathers name (C's).
Give adequate advice to C's Grand son. Because he is poor.
Thanking you sirs.
chandra1
30 September 2009 at 09:54
A judgement passed in w.p.no 7571/2005 is being enclosed herewith kindly advised me whether the services of the petitioner can be regularised. A special Appeal has been preferred agaist the judgement and the application of intrim relief of the state has been rejected.
adv revati kotwal
30 September 2009 at 08:54
Does the sub registrar has to deduct any tax while registering property.
ashok prajapati
30 September 2009 at 08:45
cureption cases mai kitne din ke limite hoti hai chargsheet file kar ne ke? plzz its a urgent give me my answer
lakshmanaraja
30 September 2009 at 08:41
hello,
my grandfather had gifted me apiece of land which had been allotted in his name in the partition deed made between him and his sons--in feb 2002, and he had gifted me the same in november 2002 and it is a registered deed. i have the registered documents and have taken possessio of the land and have leased it out for agricultural purposesfrom nov 2002.i ampaying the land ta to govt of tamilnadu and i have the reciepts.but i have not changed the patta to my name.in november 2007 my grandfathers youngest son had influenced him and got the gift deed cancelled without my knowledge and executed a gift deed in his name the same day. it is stated in the cancellation deed that since i have not changed the patta to my name ,i was not interested in the gift and so he has cancelled the gift. my grandfather died in january 2007., and i came to know about the cancellation only recently. what shall i do., kindly advice me
shanmuga sundaram
30 September 2009 at 01:17
RESPECTED SIRS, Iam 67yrs old exservicman from navy &my wife is 62 yrs.Both have age
related health problems,under regular medical treatmment from defence source.My eldest son, aged 38 yrs died in london on 29 sept 2008.He was senior SAP consultant.He was working in abroad for more than 10 years.His earnings in the form of immovable & moovable properties worth around rs 5 crores.My self earnd residntial house was also given to him through a irrevocable deed of settlement, with condition for living rights for me & my wife at the back porton of the main house.The living right is valid till our life time.Now serious problems have setin with my daughter inlaw & she is not willing for any type of compromise in property partion issue.We have one grandson aged about 13 years.Now the legal heirs for my late son's all the earnings are my wife(mother), daughterin law &grand son.We have no other house property to live& where as my daughter in law through her legal heirship rights,gets many residential propertis which include a modern bunglow worth more than rs 1crore.We have given our only residential house to my late without taking any type of consideration & with the idea to facilitate him for further devolpment of the house, such as construction of 1st floor etc.My daughter in law is not living with us, neither with her parents house ,but living alone by herself a lavish &luxury life.I understand that it is not easy to cancel an irrevocable settment deed except by a higher level court.Again it is very time &money consuming process.We have notime remaining of our lives,and also money to spend in courts.One of my advocate is of the folowing opinion that,(1)the house has not been handed physically to my son, & we continue to live as before,till to date.(2)the deed of settlement with conditons will not be in court but may be taen as a 'WILL,& as such it can be cancelld.(3)The transfer of property tax took place only recently ie on the day of his death.The transfer of water & electricity taxes are not transferd.We do not know what will be the out come of this situation.We do not know whether we can spend our old age days peacefully.What i should do to get justice for living a peaceful life with dignity.Pleas help me?!!My second son is of no use to us as he is alcohalic,unemployed etc. kps.sundaram-coimbatore
Narinder Saini
29 September 2009 at 23:52
Land was bought by Mr X in 1955(Delhi). In 1965 mutation was done in the name of Mr x. Mr X moved out of station for personal reasons. In 1982 Mr X expired. Mr X had 5 legal heirs. As they were not aware of the location of the land they approached revenue department in 2007. (Note: Initially the land was empty and now the area is densely populated ). Now revenue department is not doing mutation in the name of legal heirs of Mr X. what should be done to get our land with possession and mutation.
sanjay kumar patibandla
29 September 2009 at 22:19
one child by name divya born to mr. mrs. venkatesh family. After the birth of divya mr. Venkatesh handed over divya to one Mr. Sreeramulu and family, who are not having children and requested Mr. Sreeramulu to return his daughtor Divya after Sreeramulu blessed with child. Accordingly Divya is with Mr. Sreeramulu and family. Now Mr. Sreeramulu also blessed with one child.
Now Mr. Venkatesh wants to take back his daughter. No adoption. But Mr. Sreeramulu is refusing to give custody of Divya.
I filed petition under guardian wards Act. But the court returned the petition by questioning the maintainability of the petition.
Please know me the correct procedure along with citations.
Mohit chawla
29 September 2009 at 21:38
Dr. Mehta and Renu got married. They lived together and led their life in a peaceful manner. Renu has done her B.Sc and she got admission in a pharmaceutical college at Nagpur with the consent of her husband. After obtaining the degree in pharmaceutical college. she joined as a pharmacist in government dispensary near Moga sometimes Dr. Mehta used to visit her and sometime Renu visited the residence of her husband. they continued to cohabit at least for three years. thereafter some difference arose between them on the issue and Dr. Mehta asked her wife to leave the job and join him. Renu refused to join him and the husband filed a petition for restitution on conjugal rights. discuss the matter and please suggest some decisive and latest authorities.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Challenging jurisdiction of court
Dear Members,
My former employer filed a money recovery suit at a Delhi court. The plaintiff is a Delhi based pvt Ltd company & have tried to prove that i had worked in Delhi whereas the fact is that i had always worked out of Delhi, gave a promissory note out of Delhi , the note got dishonored (means the payment was stopped by me)at a local bank ( operated by the branch of the co.)out of Delhi.
I read sections 19 & 20 of CPC 1908 & examples given does not relates to me. I want to challenge the jurisdiction of the delhi court & wants to bring the case to my home town.
Pls advise