PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
18 April 2009 at 20:49
HELLO
ALL RESPECTED EXPERTS,
MY CLIENT HAVING THE BANK ACCOUNT IN THE ICICI BANK IN THE JAMNAGAR AS MR X IN THE SAME WAY THERE IS ANOTHER BANK ACCOUNT IN THE DELHI IN THE SAME BANK OF THE OTHER FELLOW AS SAME NAME AS X [ THE NAME OF THE ACCOUNT HOLDER OF JAMNAGAR AND THE DELHI ARE SAME] NOW QUESTION ARISE THAT MR X WHO LIVES IN THE DELHI BORROWED LOAN FROM THE BANK OF THE DELHI THE ACCOUNT HOLDER WHEN WENT TO WITHDRAW THE MONEY FROM THE BANK HE WAS INSTRUCTED THAT THE HIS BANK ACCOUNT IS BREEZED BECAUSE NON PAYMENT OF THE LOAN SO JAMNGAR BASED MR X DENIED AND COMMUNICATED TO THE ALL CONCERNED PERSONS TO UNFREEZE THE ACCOUNT BY THE EMAIL THAT NOT TAKEN THE LOAN BUT AFTER THE GIVING THE EMAIL THEN ALSO BANK WITHDRAW ALL THE AMOUNT FROM THE SALARY ACCOUNT AND DUE TO THIS REASON TWO CHEQUES GIVEN TO THE PARTY DISHONORED OF THE JAMNAGAR BASED MR X SO HE LODGED THE COMPLAINT IN THE CONSUMER COURT STATING THAT AFTER THE INTIMATION OF NO ANY KIND OF THE LOAN HOW BANK RECOVER THE SAID AMOUNT OF OTHER PERSON'S ACCOUNT MEANWHILE BANK REDEPOSITED THE AMOUNT WHICH WAS WITHDRAW ED BY IT.NOW WHICH KIND OF THE JUDGMENT I HAVE TO PRODUCE FOR THE DEFICIENCY OR FOR THE LOSS OF PRESTIGE OR OTHER DAMAGES PLS INFORM THANKS
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
18 April 2009 at 17:50
Criminal P.C.(2 of 1974),s.436-Bail by police-Magistrate does have jurisdiction to order furnishing of fresh bail bounds ?
rgurucharan
18 April 2009 at 17:46
Dear sir,
our's is a private trust governed & registerd under the Indian trust Act.
we train for the student of MBA & pgdm of iase university.
We make payment to Teaching staff based on the number of sessions handled during the month at the agreed rates fixed by the management.
Any of payment made to the individual does not exceeds Rs. 10 lacs. even then the organisation is deducting the TDS @ 11.33%. But actually it is only @10.30%.
Unnecessarily they are deducting the excess tds from the teaching staff.
Pls clarify whether what the organisation is doing is correct or not.
with regards,
R. Gurucharan.
rgurucharan
18 April 2009 at 17:36
Dear sir,
I work for an organisation, which is governed under the porvisions of the private trust.ie. Indian Trust Act.
In our organisation we give training for management courses such as MBA & PGDM courses of IASE university.
In our organisation the following is the list of people who work for this organisation. The following is the break up given below.
1) Faculties (both visiting & permanent staff put together) 25 people.
2) Non Teaching staff
a) Paid salary 12
b) Paid as stiphend 26
3) Mess/Hostel staff 30
Total no. of people 93
as on 31/03/2009
Sir please guide me with provision applicable for the organisation under the labour and Industrial law.
With regards,
R. Gurucharan.
Rajesh Chawhan
18 April 2009 at 16:39
FBT IS APPLICABLE TO pROPRIETORSHIP COMPANY ? OR IT IS BASED ON TURNOVER ?
sanjiv batra
18 April 2009 at 16:37
DATED: 17TH APRIL’ 2009.
DEAR SIR,
ACCORDING TO COMPANIES ACT 1956, A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REQUIRES MINIMUM TWO SHAREHOLDERS FOR INCORPORATION, WHEREAS A PUBLIC LIMITED CO. REQUIRES SEVEN SHAREHOLDERS FOR INCORPORATION.
LOGICALLY THEREFORE I UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN A PARTNERSHIP FIRM WITH TWO PARTNERS WANTS TO CONVERT ITSELF INTO A PUBLIC LIMITED CO. UNDER CHAPTER-IX OF CO’S ACT, IT MUST FIRST ENHANCE THE NUMBER OF PARTNERS TO SEVEN, ONLY THEN IT CAN CONVERT ITSELF INTO A PUBLIC LIMITED CO., BUT ACCORDINGLY WHEN A PARTNERSHIP FIRM WITH TWO PARTNERS WANTS TO CONVERT ITSELF INTO A PRIVATE LIMITED CO. UNDER CHAPTER-IX OF THE CO’S ACT, IT CAN DO SO WITH TWO PARTNERS ITSELF WITHOUT ENHANCING THE NUMBER OF PARTNERS.
KINDLY CONFIRM MY UNDERSTANDING URGENTLY.
ALSO TELL ME THAT WHAT WILL BE THE INCOME TAX IMPLICATIONS?
THANKS
SKB
sanjiv batra
18 April 2009 at 16:31
DATED: 17TH APRIL’ 2009.
DEAR SIR,
ACCORDING TO COMPANIES ACT 1956, A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REQUIRES MINIMUM TWO SHAREHOLDERS FOR INCORPORATION, WHEREAS A PUBLIC LIMITED CO. REQUIRES SEVEN SHAREHOLDERS FOR INCORPORATION.
LOGICALLY THEREFORE I UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN A PARTNERSHIP FIRM WITH TWO PARTNERS WANTS TO CONVERT ITSELF INTO A PUBLIC LIMITED CO. UNDER CHAPTER-IX OF CO’S ACT, IT MUST FIRST ENHANCE THE NUMBER OF PARTNERS TO SEVEN, ONLY THEN IT CAN CONVERT ITSELF INTO A PUBLIC LIMITED CO., BUT ACCORDINGLY WHEN A PARTNERSHIP FIRM WITH TWO PARTNERS WANTS TO CONVERT ITSELF INTO A PRIVATE LIMITED CO. UNDER CHAPTER-IX OF THE CO’S ACT, IT CAN DO SO WITH TWO PARTNERS ITSELF WITHOUT ENHANCING THE NUMBER OF PARTNERS.
KINDLY CONFIRM MY UNDERSTANDING URGENTLY.
PLEASE TELL ME WHAT WILL BE THE INCOME TAX IMPLICATIONS?
THANKS
SKB
Ganesh
18 April 2009 at 16:27
One person was arrested U/s 307 of IPC he was granted bail on the condition that he has to attend police station every day. Now almost 3 months have passed. The lawyer informed him that once the chargesheet will be filed he wil not be required to daily go to police station. But Yet the charge sheet is not filed. My question is from when he will not be required to go to the police station is there any other remedy to the person.
GANESH
ranjithreddy
18 April 2009 at 16:19
i am a CA student,3 years back my father gave some money to a ST candidate to be as a worker at our fields due to non-compliance service by him(he is unable to return money) he gave his land pass book to my father.(11/2year back my father expired)so in that they gave us a paper as they will later,if they not repay we can ask them double to that money all this matter written in a paper which may not be leagally enforciable(say a note book paper) can we handover the land.I don't them till now so i'm unable to contact them can any suggest me how i can get land/money leagally through police/MRO
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
regarding the fees
hello all experts,
i was engaged as lawyer to obtain letter of administration at the stage of the time of the evidence of the case both party compromised and not given any kind of the fees as per decided [not a single rupees] they with draw all money which were in the post office and distributed into one another without informing which kind of the remedy for the lawyer available to recover the fees
thanks in advance