Anonymous
24 November 2017 at 23:47
I'm planning to publish a book of literary criticism containing studies of poems. The book has been structured in the following manner -- Poem 1 followed by Study 1, Poem 2 followed by Study 2 and so on and so forth. Will the inclusion of poems in the book constitute copyright violation? All poets except one are dead. It's hard to trace / procure permission from legal heirs. What's the legal position? Are there any limitations on lines which could be quoted?
What's the way out? What are the worst implications?
Vinod Kumar Gupta
24 November 2017 at 21:46
Bounce cheque was lost. I submitted photocopy of dishonoured cheque with application of sec.65 evidence act with an affidavit now for cognizance Magistrate ask me to show any ruling that cognizance can be taken on photocopy of cheque though there is application of 65 evidence act and report of lost cheque in police. Please send me ruling or judgements that cognizance can be taken on secondary evidence also.
Rita shah
24 November 2017 at 20:42
Need advise on filing the petition by my self as I cannot hier any lawyer due to financial constrain. It is a mutual consent as both husband and wife are separated since 9 years...Wife does not need any alimony or maintanance. Have a 10 yr old son...Never met his father ....
Anonymous
24 November 2017 at 20:24
Hello!
Is there a provision in the Indian law that permits one respondent to cross examine another respondent in a domestic violence case? If there is, it would help to know the specifics and if not, it would help to know of any judgements passed to this effect.
Thank you!
Anonymous
24 November 2017 at 19:08
Respected experts, Please intimate me regarding lease deed such as maximum period and renewal thereof detailed below.
1.What is the minimum period of a lease deed.
2.What is the maximum period of a lease deed.
3.Whether a lease deed can be renewed after executing for maximum period (i.e.99 /90 years) with the mutual willingness.
4.Special provisions in the state of maharshtra for 1 to 3 mentioned above.
Please examine the issue and guide me accordingly.
Thanks Yours faithfully,
R.N.Shah
Kishor Mehta
24 November 2017 at 19:05
Very recently There have been far reaching changes in the Maharashtra Co-operative Housing Societies Laws, will the Hon. Experts please shed some light on this and oblige.
Senior Citizen
Anonymous
24 November 2017 at 17:48
There is another very peculiar problem in my legal case -138 N.I act
I , Rashim rajpal as authorised signatory of the company signed cheques on behalf of the company and gave it to some vendor on trust but he misused the cheques by presenting them in bank .
1. The formeost point is that the complainant has not mentioned my name Rashim rajpal (signatory of cheque) in the complaint but has mentioned one of the directors name and company's name in the complaint and has also presumed that the director has issued cheque which got bounce .
2. The complainant has forged the cheques by making 24/1/2016 to 24/4/2016 which can be made easily. The cheques were issued on 24/1/2016 . I immediately got to know about the forgery and complained the bank to stop the cheques and mentioned that there was material alteration in dates. The cheques got bounced and he obviously did put up the complaint . Cheque memo stated - 'Signature mismatch and Material alteration' as the reasons for cheque bouncing.
A.Now my concern is that when the complainant has not mentioned the name in the complaint who has actually signed the cheque . Can the complaint be quashed on above grounds ?
Because according to my lawyer it is must to mention the name of person and the complainant has to make party in complaint who has signed the cheque.
B. Second thing i am thinking is to make an appeal for material alteration done in the cheque . Please suggest
Can the complaint be quashed on (A) AND (B) GROUNDS ?
Himanshu Vaidya
24 November 2017 at 17:17
Dear Experts,
I was working with M/s. Galaxy Sivtek P. Ltd. – Vadodara, Gujarat as a National Sales Manager & resign on 2nd August 2017 due to personnel reason. I was ready to serve notice period as per company policy but company has decide to relieve me on the same day. During the full & final settlement given letter mentioned all the dues including Festive pay of last year 2016-17. I was told by the management that it will pay me in Diwali time. When I inquired in Diwali time, I was told in written email that during my leaving time there are many other employee also left & company is going for legal action on it & could not pay you the money. Many time I asked for the proper reason but they refused.
As per friend's request, I visited Labour office to file a complaint but got the information that as my basic salary is more than Rs. 10,000/- I am not eligible for Bonus Pay (Festive Pay) even after mentioned in the full & final settlement letter. I could not understand the proper reason but they refuse to explain it.
Dear Experts, can you please guide me in this case please!
yogesh thaware
24 November 2017 at 16:38
I had filed an original application against my transfer order in Central administrative tribunal Bombay in April 2017.The central administrative tribunal stayed my transfer order with following observations by tribunal judges �From the perusal of all records it is apparent that there has been a degree of arbitrariness and discrimination in issuing the transfer order to the applicant. In view of this the respondents are directed not to relieve the applicant till the reply filed by the respondents is considered by this tribunal and decision is taken on the continuance of Ad-interim/interim orders.�After filling the reply and a miscellaneous application by the respondents the Tribunal continued my Interim relief and gave next date of hearing. The respondents then filed a writ petition in Bombay high court challenging this interim relief granted by the tribunal. The Bombay high court refused to intervene or pass any kind of order against this interim relief granted by tribunal and dismissed respondents writ petition within eight days after it was filed. The Bombay high court learned judges did not find any substantial reason to intervene and gave a little dressing down to the respondent�s lawyer. The following were the observations by Bombay high court in its order �we are not inclined to interfere or intervene at this stage however we are inclined to direct the tribunal to dispose off this matter within six weeks from the date of communication of this order. The tribunal continued my interim relief after Bombay high court order was duly communicated by my lawyer. The respondents simply refused to comply with the tribunal order and somehow managed to get my original application dismissed in August 2017 (five months after the interim relief was given by tribunal).To my utter shock and dismay there were some glaring and fatal errors in the judgment order (errors of facts as well as errors of law).with the dismissal of my original application the interim relief given by tribunal stood vacated (five months after it was granted) and therefore I decided to join my new transferred posted station with certain condition and protest as legal protection was no longer there for me. After thoroughly examining the judgment order of Tribunal .I and my lawyer then decided to file a review petition in the tribunal on the following grounds:-
1) Errors apparent on the face of record.
2) New important piece of evidence has been discovered and applicant could not file it inspite of due diligence and care on his part.
The review petition was admitted by the tribunal and a notice to that effect was issued to the respondents to file reply within four weeks after notice receipt. However the respondents taking the advantage of system loopholes did not respond through any reply nor their lawyer appeared on the fixed date of hearing (30/10/17).The tribunal judge gave a further date of hearing in the month of December 2017.The petition prepared by me and my lawyer is so watertight that the respondents do have any reply to file and I suspect that with no strict provision in law to punish or penalize the respondents for non appearance (unless the tribunal judge takes a strong cognizance of this disobedience) the respondents may very cleverly take an advantage and skip tribunal hearings. Although me and my lawyer have an option of filing a mandamus and certiorari petition in high court I would like to have a more clear opinion from all the experts so as to make the respondents appear and file their reply and compel the tribunal to make respondents to obey its orders and dispose off this review petition at the earliest. The respondents are the employees of public sector undertaking (Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd)
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Not getting FNF and Reliving letter
Hi Sir/ Mam,
I worked with Revmax company for 1yr and 6 month. I served 60days notice period as per policy. Got sign on my HOTO and clarnace form cleared from manager and HOTO person. But after 85 days of leaving organization at the time of fnf they had made my fnf zero from rs.17000 by giving some rubbish remarks of mismanagement of data because of which company faced loss. I don't know what to do. It is all done by that MD. Company is not giving proper relieving anyone they are doing this kind of foolish thing to spoil employee career.
I got 2 time increment and promotion. My records are clear but still they are saying that manager has given remark on clearance. How they can put any remark without my sign and in absence of me. Please suggest. What I can do in this case.