viswanaathan A K
21 February 2009 at 18:18
Pl give the report on consumer protecton Act, That is a loss of Fire. The Building and plant and machinery was about 10 years. There is loss of underinsurance. Pl gve the details.
A.K.Viswanaathan
venkat reddy
21 February 2009 at 13:43
sale deed has been executed,vendee has been issued cheques for payment but the same has been dishonoured,cheque numbers has been mentioned, what will be the remedy whether to file cancellation of sale deed or 138 of NI Act.
please help out.
rk
21 February 2009 at 13:18
hello, heard there is law that states that
soc. cannot take more then 3 years interest on unpaid dues ? in what situations is this valid or applicable
rk
21 February 2009 at 13:14
hello, my flat was in dispute for over 10 years i have recently been awarded a ruling in my favour, now soc. want me to pay maintenace due for last ten years along with 21% interest , this flat was lying vacant
Pl an indemnity bond was also furnished to soc for xfer of flat , but soc. refuses to send/correspond till date and time
is there some rule under which soc. can waive of interest or what relief can i get as soc is not cooperating.
Chetan
21 February 2009 at 12:46
A complainant filed 3 different cases for 3 cheques, whereas the parties are same,and the transaction is same, under such circumstances whether I can file an application for trying those criminal cases joinlty or coupled it .
Pls provide any provision and citation
Chetan
21 February 2009 at 12:39
My client has filed a suit for partition over a ancestral house property.
Recently my client learnt that one of the defendant sought Cash Credit from SBI BAnk by mortgaging the suit property.
Under such circumsatnces what should I do
Chetan
21 February 2009 at 12:36
Sir, My client was serving with a company on 5000/- Rs. Emoluments per month and the company also gives him TA & DA.
Now since last 8 months the company did not pay a single pai & that's why my client left the job. My client send letter to the company for payment but they didn't reply.
Now whether I can send them Legal Notice
Heaven 2011
21 February 2009 at 12:29
In a license agreement entered with the licensee there is a clause "it is hereby clarified and agreed that the present demise is for a term of 3 yrs during which period either party can terminate this agreement by giving 1 months notice.After the expiry of such license period, this agreement may be renewed at the option of the Licensor on the same terms and conditions for further two periods of three years each..."
Respected gentelmen, my query is if this agreement is renewed can i incorporate new clause containing new terms and conditions or can i amend or delete this existing clause? Can i have any theory back up for the concerned issue from Indian Contract Act?
Kindly advise.
With best regards,
Asish
Heaven 2011
21 February 2009 at 12:29
In a license agreement entered with the licensee there is a clause "it is hereby clarified and agreed that the present demise is for a term of 3 yrs during which period either party can terminate this agreement by giving 1 months notice.After the expiry of such license period, this agreement may be renewed at the option of the Licensor on the same terms and conditions for further two periods of three years each..."
Respected gentelmen, my query is if this agreement is renewed can i incorporate new clause containing new terms and conditions or can i amend or delete this existing clause? Can i have any theory back up for the concerned issue from Indian Contract Act?
Kindly advise.
With best regards,
Asish
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
attestation on chief affidavit in 138 Of N I act case
One gentle man filed a case under 138 of NI act. When it was come for trail he filed his chief affidavit before the court. After that he came to witness box and the defense council cross examined him. Entire trail completed.
At the time of arguments the defense council raised a point that the chief affidavit was not attested by any person hence the evidence of the complainant can not be taken into consideration. So the accused must be acquitted.
Is it correct as per oath act or general clauses act. Please let me know.