V V SATYANARAYANA
01 November 2008 at 17:54
Sirs,
In the the year 2002 in June & August we have procured 3 cranes at a cost of Rs. 1 crore each from a reputed cranes manufacturing in India.
In August 2004 we have purchased one more crane from them. Right from the delivery of the equipment at the site, these machines have not been performing and persistently giving troube and we could not get desired production from these 4 equipments. Though the Seller was attending but never the problems were sorted out. If a defect is rectified again another defect would crop up like that.For rectifying these defects also we have spent lakhs of rupees on each of these 4 cranes. Made full payments to the Party except in one case where we have deducted very little towards non-performance (there is no legal dispute for this deducted amount).
Finally the Seller stopped manufacturer stopped the manufacture of these cranes from 2006 or 2007 that means there might be some design fault or so. We have made several correspondences by way of lodging complaints highlighting the problems right through.
Can we at this stage can write to them to compensate for the losses we have suffered or can we approach the Consumer Forum for the deficiency in service.
Is there any remedy available to us and whether we have lost the opportunity under Limitation Act.
Kindly give your opinion as to what best we can do for redressal.
Thanking you,
V.V.Satyanarayana
Bharat Gala
01 November 2008 at 17:18
Sir,
My querry is whether Company Can file the case in consumer Forum for recovery of short claim from Insurance Comapny ??
bhuushan bankar
01 November 2008 at 15:38
if there is consent term taken place in a spl. civil suit can the defendants that is any one of them can file another suit challenging the consent term which they have agreed to and which was read to them by their Adv. and also the judge had asked them whether they agreed this consent term .... so can any one of them harass the plaintiff for more money
G. ARAVINTHAN
01 November 2008 at 13:14
An Insolvency petition is dismissed for default. What is the procedure to restore it?
A K SARAVANAN
01 November 2008 at 13:04
A Dispute between land owner and super structure owner from long years, finally the commissioner of Land Adminsitration was passed a order in favour of us on 1992.
Land vested to government and super structure owner can move to patta.
The Land owner Writ petition filed to Madras High court on 1997 (after five years), case is pending till date. (01.11.2008) In the connections ,We are moving patta during the period from 1992.
Now we are trying patta under TN Free townside vested land patta Scheme.
Our doubt:
1. Writ petition is pending in the case
2. If we are getting patta from government under TN Free vested land scheme, the patta is valuable or not.
3. Writ petition filed after 5 years, the case is stand or not (I think time barred)
A K SARAVANAN
01 November 2008 at 12:19
I WOULD LIKE TO ENTER A PARTNERSHIP FIRM. THERE IS NO CAPITAL IN FIRM.
WHAT AMOUNT I BOUGHT STAMP PAPER AGREEMENT. (RS. 100 OR RS.300)
SARAVANAN AK
A K SARAVANAN
01 November 2008 at 12:19
I WOULD LIKE TO ENTER A PARTNERSHIP FIRM. THERE IS NO CAPITAL IN FIRM.
WHAT AMOUNT I BOUGHT STAMP PAPER AGREEMENT.
SARAVANAN AK
Mohamed Ali
01 November 2008 at 11:58
A Muslim Partition suite was decreed, In which my grand mother is entitle for 1/17th as per decree in the total property of her father
Note: In Mohameddan law, Predeceased son /daughter childrens are not entitle for any share in their grandparents property, Also in Muslim law birth right is not recognized, therefore the right to property in question will come only after the death of property holder.
My grand mother died after decree, As per decree my great grand mother got 1/17 share, and her only son predeceased her and only 2 daughters survived her.
When filing for Final decree proceedings they brought on record these children of predeceased son as legal heirs of predeceased son who are grandchildren of share holder
who are misjoinders as per law and order 1 rule 10(2) can be applied to delete this misjoinders at any stage of proceedings.
We have filed an Interim Application in pending final decree proceedings to delete this misjoinders,
Will the court executing decree strike out these misjoinders,
Our doubt: Some advocate are telling the court executing decree cannot go beyond decree to delete this misjoinders, but it is a question of LR’s wrongly brought on record after the death of decree holder after the decree when filing for Final decree proceedings hence it can be taken up at any stage of proceedings .
Jyotsna
31 October 2008 at 17:38
I am NRI staying in a gulf country..My father has property in India which is got as gift from his father i.e. my Grand father....Can he give this property entirely to his Son by making will?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
deposit of title deeds
Sir, Will you please the information about the gezette copy of whith areas applied the Depost of title Deed in AP Thank @