Anonymous
08 November 2009 at 19:58
Under the RTI Act can I ask the IT Dept to tell me whether a particular person's house was raided or he was asked to give details of his income to verify whether he has paid IT?
madhukar
08 November 2009 at 19:28
i would like to know following information in regard to DV case vs me by my wife.she has filed DV case asking 20 lac compensation & Rs.10000/- she has left my house within 1 month of marrige & put up 498a case in 2007 & now DV
1. My wife is working in Goverment aided junior college in mumbai. How to get her salary slip. thorugh RTI, is it possible if yes then whom to write &what to write.
2. My wife has mentioned that she is paying EMI for paying back the loan on car & house she bought.how to get the EMI details she is paying to bank from which she is taken the loan. Limited or co-op banks ar coverd under RTI?
Pl suggest.
Anonymous
08 November 2009 at 19:18
one pramoter group of a listed copmpany gifted their's shares to second pramoter group by making gift deeds and signed blank dipositary slips second pramoter group transfered these shares by depository in theirs demat account but there was not the faith intention for the first pramoter group all this done was keeping in dark the first pramoter group besides that the gift deed was not notarised on that date and the gift deed stamp was of rs 100 what would be the legal rights of the first pramoter group in this case
Anonymous
08 November 2009 at 19:18
DHR/plaintiff and JDRs/Defendants filed a compromise petition in lower court. As per this compromise the JDRs are agreed to give some land to DHR and accordingly, the JDRS had handed over the physical possession of the land to the DHR and the same was recorded in the said compromise decree. And it is further recorded in the said compromise decree that “in case the JDRS fails to register the Sale Deed in favour of the DHR, the DHR at liberty to get the same executed through this court” the compromise was recorded in year 1990. But this compromise decree was not executed till today.
1. As the decree is time barred. who will be the owner of this land DHR OR JDRS.
2. Can DHR clam this property by any other means.
NOTE : Law of limitation only bars remedy, but does not extinguish the right.
what is meaning of above?
anshul sangal
08 November 2009 at 19:01
I am looking for training in Labour law. Is there any legal firm or company in delhi or NCR that provides training in labour law.
Ajjay
08 November 2009 at 18:41
I have a flat in a buliding where the society is not yet formed.
I want to sell the flat, But the builder in demanding Rs. 5Lacs for transfering the flat on the new owner's name.
What does the law says? Need help
Regards
Ajjay
Sanjay Kumar
08 November 2009 at 17:58
Can i get any judgment on section 379/411 IPC where the case property not produced in the Court?
avani.d
08 November 2009 at 17:42
hi,
this is avani and am from hyderabad.we deal in retail and have a store in hyderabad.recently there was a confrontation with one of the dealers in mumbai, as there was a misappropriation in accounts from his side.we put the issue in fron of market heads in mumbai and the dealer agrred he cheated upon with falsified accounts and apologised in front of all of them.there is no proof how ever, of any of the transactions either of the stock or of the money paid with him.but, we have papers in which the dealer agreed upon the payment in his oen handwriting.recently, the dealer came from mumbai to hyderabad with a complaint to the police that we have cheated them of money, and threatened him with calls which was absolutely wrong.the inspector of the local police station called us and as my husband was out of country, i went, and he denied showing me any documents regarding the same and started threatening me with dire consequences saying that the party had come with mumbai police.i was unable to understand how the police can call me without proof.and recently i have heard, that the police cannot involve in civil cases.is this correct.i have the recording of telephone conversations of the dealer, where in he admitted that he manipulated the accounts and cheated us.kindly advice.
avani.d
08 November 2009 at 17:40
hi,
this is avani and am from hyderabad.we deal in retail and have a store in hyderabad.recently there was a confrontation with one of the dealers in mumbai, as there was a misappropriation in accounts from his side.we put the issue in fron of market heads in mumbai and the dealer agrred he cheated upon with falsified accounts and apologised in front of all of them.there is no proof how ever, of any of the transactions either of the stock or of the money paid with him.but, we have papers in which the dealer agreed upon the payment in his oen handwriting.recently, the dealer came from mumbai to hyderabad with a complaint to the police that we have cheated them of money, and threatened him with calls which was absolutely wrong.the inspector of the local police station called us and as my husband was out of country, i went, and he denied showing me any documents regarding the same and started threatening me with dire consequences saying that the party had come with mumbai police.i was unable to understand how the police can call me without proof.and recently i have heard, that the police cannot involve in civil cases.is this correct.i have the recording of telephone conversations of the dealer, where in he admitted that he manipulated the accounts and cheated us.kindly advice.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
retoration of issue in secound appeal
what are the grounds for secound appeal for restoration