LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   06 November 2009 at 08:51

Trial of E.C.act & 328 ipc

challan submitted u/s 3/7 E.C.ACT & SEC. 328 IPC.The related special court for E.C. ACT is CJM/ ACJM.in this situation weather special court CJM /ACJM can trial offences related u/s 328 ipc is legal or not.
The offences u/s e.c. act & 328 ipc can be trial by special court CJM /ACJM.Even u/s 328 ipc cases are tried by CJM/ ACJM.weather SESSION COURT can trial offences related to E.C.act act &328 ipc or not? if he can trial, under which sec. of cr.p.c.?

monika   06 November 2009 at 07:42

challenging the result of reevaluation

if the students of a university apply for reevluation of their examination can the students challenge the same on the ground that no reevluation has been done on the contrary it is only recounting that has been done reason beiieng that if 200 students applied for the reevaluation more than 120 students got their result as no change not even 1% variation in their result any citation that can help

pkpworld..   06 November 2009 at 07:15

taxation of s socity in which status

A society registered under society registration ACt is required to file a Wealth Tax Return for AY 2009-10.

As pr the Wealth Tax ACt, 1956, there are threee status i.e. individual, HUF and Companty.

In which status the socity will be assessed under Wealth Tax Act?

Anonymous   06 November 2009 at 00:19

ancestral property

sir,
I was married in 1978 when I was a minor(14 years of age). My father had received 50 acres of agricultural land from my grand father and my father died in 1997.My father has not earned any property on his own.
we are 3 sisters(including me) and 3 brothers and our mother.Can you kindly suggest if i have right in my fathers property and can i claim for it in court.The property is in andhrapradesh

pkpworld..   05 November 2009 at 23:03

penalty u/s 271(1)(c)

One person filed return which was selected for scrutiny. The case was audited u/s 44AB. The ITO has passed order and demanded 78000/-. The demand raised was for the following reasons : The person has claimed excess depreciation. He had claimed depreciation @ 20% on W.d.v. of block assest instead of 15%. The assessesing officer had disallwoed excess depreciation and accordingly issued demand notice. He also imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Rs.52000/- for concealment of income and wrong particular of total income.

My query is that :
AS the case was audited by the C.A., the C.A. Should penalised for such mistake. Is there any provision of any penalty for mistake of any CA. The C.A. is a reputed and registered C.A.. Also the assessee was not aware about the various allowable percentage of depreciation, so he had taken help of such CA who also filled the reutrn of income and helped to assesse for filing of return. My point is that Why should the assessee penalised for mistake of an C.A.

Whether the imposition of penalty by the officer is correct or not.

Whether the assessee had concealed the icnome and liable for penalty.

Whether any fruitful result will be comeout if appeal filed against the order of officer?

V.V.RAMDAS   05 November 2009 at 22:52

What is law under which the tribals are guided?

Dear friends,
Codified Hindu Law lays down that its provisions do not apply to the memmbers of the Scheduled tribes comming with the meaning of clause (25) of Aricle 366 of the Constitution . Therefore under which law the tribals are guided ? Please do provide recent supreme court rulings on both (for & aginst)the sides.

V.V.RAMDAS   05 November 2009 at 22:50

What is law under which the tribals are guided?

Dear friends,
Codified Hindu Law lays down that its provisions do not apply to the memmbers of the Scheduled tribes comming with the meaning of clause (25) of Aricle 366 of the Constitution . Therefore under which law the tribals are guided ? Please do provide recent supreme court rulings on both (for & aginst)the sides.

chandra shakher joshi   05 November 2009 at 22:43

General Power of attorny

एक जनरल पॉवर १९९७ मैं लिखी गई , ब हमें पता चला है की पॉवर देने वाले तीन मैं से एक इंडिया से बहार रहेता है शायद पॉवर देते वक़्त वो इंडिया मैं नहीं था उसकी जगह किसी दुसरे को पेश कर पॉवर ली गई अब हम किस प्रकार पता कर सकते हैं की वह उस समय इंडिया में था या अब्रोअद था ?
दूसरा प्रश्न यह है की पॉवर देने वाले की दो बहनों ने पॉवर नहीं दी यह प्रोपर्टी एन्सस्त्रल नहीं है , तो क्या पॉवर को वोइड घोषित कराया जा सकता है ? पॉवर लेने वाले ने पॉवर के आधार पर जब अपील की तो दोनों बहनों के हमारे साथ रेस्पोंदेंत बना दिया !
(सी एस जोशी)
chandra55602@gmail.com

chandra shakher joshi   05 November 2009 at 22:31

General Power of attorny

After death of a person his wife and two sons give power of attorney in a property case to one in 1997. Now we came to know that one of the son is living abroad and it might be possible that at the time of power he was not in India. Another person was produced on his name and power was executed.

Now the question is - How can I get the record of the person that whether he was abroad or he was in India ?

Second question is - Two daughters are also alive, who did't give the power and in the second appeal in High Court the sisters were placed in the place of respondents, with me, by the power holder. Can the power be declared illegal? The property in question is not ancestral.
(C.S.Joshi)

chandra55602@gmail.com

pkpworld..   05 November 2009 at 21:47

Violation of section 269SS of income tax act.

Shopkeepter(owner of aHero Honda Show room)received a cash deposit of Rs.30000/- for advance o