BAALASUBRAMANNYAMM
03 November 2009 at 13:47
Respected Sir,
Sub: - Suit filed for declaration on adoption.
“A” is filed a suit for declaration claiming that he was an adopted son of “X and Y” and he further stating that he was adopted by “X and Y” at the age of 5 years and all his educational records are showing that his parents are “X and Y” He filed the suit against B and others.
“B” is also defending the above case that “A” is not an adopted son and I am the adopted son of “X and Y” He is stating that he was adopted in the year 1983 as per Hindu caste custom and in the year 1985 an adopted deed was duly executed by Y (adopted father) and registered in the office of Sub registrar office of the concerned area ,since the adopted mother “x” was died prior to the registration of the adoption deed .(died after the adopted ceremony.) And also a Gazette Notification has been made to that effect. All the revenue records are also in the name of “B” till now, after the death of “X” adopted mother. Since the lands are in the name of adopted mother. Subsequently the adopted father was also died. In this we are appearing for “B”.
So I want to clarify the following doubts.
1. How “A” is proving that he is an adopted son of X and Y. and simply filed a Transfer certificate of college and other un-important documents like Pan card, Driving license, voters list etc. ,showing that his father name is “Y”.
2. And wherein “B” is having sufficient documentary evidence like.,
(1) Registered adoption deed.2) Gazette Notification. (3) Revenue Records and (4) all school records.
(3) How the suit is going to be dismissed.
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 13:20
We intend to start retailing of frozen foods & will be selling in Delhi / Gurgaon / Ghaziabad to be procured from Andhra Pradesh. Expected turnover is Rs.5 Lacs for the first year. The query is:-
1. Do we need to go for any kind of registration like VAT / CST / Shops & Establishment etc.?
2. Initially can the place of business be our residence?
3. We will not be engaging any manpower!
4. In case registration is not required, what kind of documents do we carry while procuring, delivering and transportation etc.
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 13:02
Dear sirs,
My query is this that a person died leaving 2 sons and 3 daughters.as his will is registered but the language of will is not correct,as there is a lot of mistakes in drafting that will.
my querey is this that if language is not corret then it will be beneficial for the daughters to get share for the said property if the property is self aquired.
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 13:02
I live with my mother in an ownership flat in Mumbai which is solely in her name. I am a nominee. She is keen to add my wife and my name to the share certificate during her lifetime. What is the procedure?
Also, is it true that I would have to pay stamp duty if my mother were to transfer the flat in our names during her lifetime?
Thank you
bhavana
03 November 2009 at 12:45
Hallo!I have given an exam conducted by ESIC model hospital indore. I was passed in written exam and five candidates were selected for the final interview out of them I had produced 32 enclosure and had the best track record amongst them. After 15 days of interview Dainik Bhaskar in its sting operation discloed a bribe case for this particular exam but for other post( i have applied for the post of medico social worker)and also I haven't selected for the post. My question is that how to apply for stay against this in the court and where?
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 12:13
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:12
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:11
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:10
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
fir u/s-420,406 ipc.
A newly merried husband filed fir against his wife along with two person one meadator second brother, u/s-420,406,after few days of marriage.
that she take 50,000/=Rs.before marry ,and after marriage she take jwelary go to her father's home and breaching the crimnal trust.
However originalty is this that after marriage husband is not maintaining the conjugal right and fals case has imposed over her.
one person (brother)is in jail.
police has filed chargesheet .
wht is d difence?
wht will d bail point?