Rajneesh Madhok
27 September 2009 at 11:39
The reply received by PIO improvement Trust is as under; The Rti Application's points are being pasted alongwith this mail.
1. ????? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ??! ??? ????? ???????, ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ????/ ???? ?? ?????? (??????? ????) ?? ???? ?? ?? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ????????? ??????/ ????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?????????? ?? ??????????? ??? ?????? ???????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ?? !
2. ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??: 1 ?? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??!
3. ?? ???????? ?????? ??? ?? ???????? ??????? ???? ?? ??!
4. ?????? ???????? ?????? ??? ?? ???????? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??!
5. ???? 27.08.2009 ?? 22.09.09 ?? ????????? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ??! ??? ?? ????????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ?????/ ?????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ????!
6. ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??: 5 ?? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??!
7. ???? 27.08.2009 ?? 22.09.09 ?? ????????? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ???????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ??? ??!
8. ??????? ????????? ??????? ??? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??? ???????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??!
9. ????? ?? ???????? ?????? ????? ??: 683 ?? ???? ?????? ????? ? ???? ???? ??????? ???????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????? ?? ???? ??: 212 ???? 18.02.2000 ?????? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ?????, ????? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ???? ???????? ?? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ???? ??: 51 ???? 14.01.2005 ?????? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??! ?? ???? ?? ????? ??? ?? ???? 10.02.2005 ?? ??????? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?? 31.12.2005 ?? ?? ????? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ??, ?? ?? ?????? ? ????? ??? (construction fees) ?? ??? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ?? ????? ? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??????? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? (proceeding) ??: 11 ???? 14.02.2005 ??? ???? ??? ??, ?? ??????? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ??? ??! ????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?? ?? ????!
10. ???? ?? ???? ??: 9 ??? ????? ???? ??? ?? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ????!
11. ????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????? ?????, ?????? ?? ??? ????? ??: 3????- 2006/7676 ???? 25.05.2006 ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ??! ????? ????? ?????? ?????????, ??????? ?????, ?????? ?? ??? ???? ??: 3????-2006/6928 ???? 10.05.2006 ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ?? ????? ?? ???????? ?????? ???? ??: 331 ???? 25.05.2006 (???? ??????) ?????? ?? ???? ??!
(Regarding this letter Deputy Director, Local Govt. Jalandhar had written to the Executive officer, Improvement trust the copy of that letter had been forwarded to me. The contents of the letter is Reference to the Reminder letter No. 3DDSS-2006/6926 dated 10.5.2006 regading Sub: Apeeal against Resumption of Plot No. 683 at Guru Hargobind Nagar, Phagwara.
Regarding the matter cited above in the case of Rajneesh Madhok of Nehru Nagar, st no. Railway Raod, Phagwara's complaint dated 2.4.2006. The copy of the complaint has been sent to you and you were requested to send the report in this connection by 15.5.2006. But your office has not done sent the required information up to now to this office. With this letter you are requested to send the demanded report without further delay up to 27.5.2006 to this office so that further action could be taken in this case.
Sd/-
Deputy Director,
Local Govt. Jalandhar
Ref No. 3DDSS-2006/7676 dt. 25/5/06
The copy of this letter is being forwarded to Rajneesh madhok, Nehru nagr, gali no. 2, Phagwara for information.
Deputy Director Local Govt, Jalandhar.)
12. ??????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? !
13. ????? ??: 1 (???? ???????? ???), ?????? ??? ??????? ????? ?? ??.??. ??? 1,70,000/- ????? ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ???????? ???? ??? ??!
14. ???? ?? ???? ???? ??: 9 ?? 10 ??? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?? ????? ??: 683 ????? ??: 1, (???? ???????? ???) ????? ???? ??? ?? ????? ?? ????? ??? ???????? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ?????!
15. ?? ????? ?????? ???? ??: 14 ?? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ??!
16. ?? 17, ??????? ????, ????? ?????? ????? ??: 1 ??? ?? ????? ???? (Change of land use from residential to commercial, the locality has turned to commercial as the all big hospitals and nursing homes have been turned to commercial complexes) ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???????? (???????) ?? ??????? ???? ?? ??? ???????? ??? (???????????) ??? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????? ?? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ???
18. ?? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ?????, ????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ??: 5/103/04-4?????2/3794 ???? 12.05.2006 ?? ??? ????? ?? !
19. ?? ???? ??? ????? (???????? ) ????? ?? ??????? ??
20, ?? ????? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???
21. ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ??: 18 ??? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???????? ?? ??? ???? ??? ! ?? ?? ????? 85% ???? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ???! (On 20th Aug 2009 the News has been published in Dainik Bhaskar that the meeting had been held by Punjah Govt, in which 26 chairmen of Improvement trust have participated and in this meeting it was decided in the meeting that those people have been given relaxation who have violated the site map and has enhanced the covered area. It is decided in the meeting that the persons who have covered 85% of area, there case should be finalized after imposing penalty)
22. ??????? ????? ?????? ?????? 2009 ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????.
(????? ?????? ?? ????: ????????? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ??????- 20 ????? 2009)
???????? : ??????????? ??????? ????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???
????? ?????? ?? ???? ?????, ?????? ??? ?? ?? ???? ?????? ?????????
To
The Public Information officer,
Improvement Trust,
Phagwara-
Under the provision of Right to Information Act, 2005, I hereby seek information on the following points. I am the holder of Plot No. 683, Improvement Trust, Scheme No. 1, (Guru Hargobind Nagar), Phagwara,
1. No. of applications received, with date, applicants name and postal address for the registration of sale deeds, from the original allotties of the plots, sold by Improvement Trust, Phagwara & payment of stamp duty received on actual/ original allotment price.
2. No. such applications allowed with date, applicants name & postal address
3. No. of such applications rejected with date, applicants name & postal address.
4. What speaking orders were passed & whether conveyed in the rejected cases to the applicants.
5. No. of applications for Registration of Sale deeds and payment of stamp duty received with date, applicants name and postal address on actual/ original allotment price, after the guidelines & directions issued in print media with the meeting held by 26 Chairmen of Improvement Trusts.
6. No. of such applications allowed with date, applicants name & postal address after the guidelines & directions passed in the said meeting as stated above in Col 5.
7. No. of such applications rejected with date, applicants name & postal address after the guidelines & directions in the meeting held as per Col 5.
8. What speaking orders were passed & whether conveyed in the rejected cases, to the applicants after the guidelines & directions in the judgements passed till date.
9. Kindly provide me the amout of dues in Plot no. 683, Guru Hargobind Nagar, Phagwara purchased by Rajneesh Madhok, B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2, Railway Road, Phagwara
10. Kindly provide me the documents required for getting the r
Raviprem
27 September 2009 at 11:38
Dear Sir,
i was fighting against FIAT/ TATA/Prerana Motor (FIAT Manufacturer of the FIAT Multijet car, TATA the supplier of the said car and Prerana the dealer) and eventually the case was dismissed by the District Consumer forum, Bangalore. I feel that the Judgment provided was a corrupted / Corporate judgment instead of a Consumer judgment. This is the obvious feeling of a looser, none of the points presented by me were looked nor i have got any responses for the questions raised by me. They have also not looked into the arguments which i have provided.
The District consumer forum looked only the points presented by the OPs. it is almost copy paste of the ambiguous points presented by the opposite parties
I have a question here, can i file RTI on the consumer forums' order regarding why they haven’t looked into the exhibits submitted by me and why the president did not request for the written response from the OPs for the written arguments which i have submitted to the forum as i demand an explanation on it. This also clarifies me if there was any kind of corruption involved.
To give you a short description about the background of the issue
Before buying the car i have explicitly enquired about the spare parts availability and the service centers of the FIAT car.
Dealer has intimated to me that no need to worry about the spares or service centers. i can approach any TATA motors service Center in India for servicing and repairing the FIAT cars.
MY ENTIRE DECISSION MAKING TO BUY THIS CAR WAS MISGUIDED BY THEIR FALSE PROMISES. Based on their false promises i have decided in buying the Diesel version of the FIAT car as i do lot of travel
1) i met with an accident when i was travelling to Hyderabad from Bangalore.
2) Took the car to TATA Motors service center in Ananthapur, they refused to take the repair the car as they do not have the expertise
3) That TATA Motors Authorized dealer said that FIAT cars are repaired only in metros and Bangalore and in Hyderabad and nowehre else in india they repair it
4) I somehow manage to get the accident car to the so call Expertise location in Bangalore and they were unable to repair this car for more than 60 days and giving me the following reasons
a) SAP Upgradation at FIAT
b) System Integration between FIAT and TATA
c) No Stock of Parts at TATA
d) FIAT not sending the parts
e) Delay because of Diwali festival
f) Prerana also mentioned to me that they have 2 other cars which are waiting for over a month and mine is 3rd in line.
5) i decided on filing the consumer case and filed a case on 18Th of December 2008 and updated the same to the Dealer
6) after filing the complaint the said parties woke up and repaired my car and updated me on 25th and 27the they sent an email
7) i have filed the case for refunding of the money which i have spent on this car along with a demand of compensation. the reason for this is "Unfair and restrictive trade practice"
a) false information provided to me stating that the car can be serviced by any TATA motors service center
b) false information of Spares availability
c) Neither the Dealer nor the Supplier or the manufacturer were taking the responsibility of repairing my car
d) my entire decision making on buying this FIAT car was misguided because of this
e) i have provided the brochure of the FIAT car and requested for how i should identify which TATA motors dealers are authorized for repairing the vehicle as it was not provided either in the manual or in the brochure which they have provided to me after buying the car. for repairing was not considered for examination before providing the judgment
f) i have also provided the case of Vinoo Bhagat Vs. General Motors (India) Ltd. http://cms.nic.in/ncdrcrep/judgement/00FA1501998.htm where the entire amount of the car was refunded because of the false information provided to the consumer stating that the car was German engineering but in reality it was manufactured in Australia. Neither this was considered
g) in my case the false information was about hiding the facts that the TATA service centers responsible for servicing the FIAT vehicle are only in metros and the availability of spares.
The case was dismissed stating that 2 months delay was not an inordinate delay.
i can provide you copies of the complaint which i have raised, my arguments and the required documents for your referral
I request you to please help me how i should move forward on this case as i lost trust on the Karnataka District / State consumer forum.
Can i directly approach National Consumer Forum bypassing State Consumer forum.
Can i File RTI on the District Consumer forum for the reasons why he has not looked into the exhibits provided by me
BTW i did not engage any lawyer for fighting my case. I did not engage lawyers here because they are only good for fighting cases for Sambar and Rasam powder or Idlly mix but they are not fit for fighting a good case.
Initially I had a discussion with 2 - 3 lawyers they say we shall fight but later after 4 - 5 days they are Discouraging me stating that the judges are not good here in Bangalore and they do not want me to proceed to next court.
i request you to please help me here as i have lost trust even on the lawyers in Bangalore, Karnataka. i would like to fight myself in the next court but not sure how i should approach.
With best regards
Ravi
Kumar
27 September 2009 at 11:24
Hello Sir / Madam,
I have a huge concern to be addressed by the legal experts in this forum.
My father died during his service in Dept of Posts in the year 2000 and I have applied for a job under compassionate Ground appointment.
Till now, it is almost ten years, there is no proper progress in the issue and my files are still pending.
Could you please advise me in regards to whether there is any leagal proceedings is possible, because my father was the only bread winner for my family.
Seeking your expertise and guidance in this regards.
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely
Kumar.
Dhiraj A Rajhans
27 September 2009 at 11:05
filed a complaint against proprietor firm under sec. 138 of N. I. Act. The name of the proprietor is typed correctly but the name of proprietor firm is typed wrongly both in complaint and evidence affidavit. the said mistake was recognized at the time of cross examination. can such mistakes be rectified??? if possible please provide case laws.....
a.manoharan
27 September 2009 at 08:31
Dear friends,
Bank issued loan on intestate property to legal heirs of wife and son on the basis of Legal Heirship Certificate issued by the Revenue Authorities and the same Mortgage was registered also. When defaulted, the Bank issued possession notice under Serfesi Act , now one unexpected legal heir saying another son sent Legal Notice claiming 1/3 equal share in the total property of house . In these circumstances , how will the Bank proceed further ? What are the Bank's other remedies ? Whether Bank can proceed further under Serfesi Act or to approach DRT directly without proceeding further under Serfesi Act?
PJANARDHANA REDDY
27 September 2009 at 07:49
I REQUEST THE QUERIEST TO MENTION THE FROM WHICH STATE THE CASE IS FALLING, ACCORDINGLY THE EXPERT CAN GUIDE AS PER THE LOCAL LAWS...
Dipak pritam
27 September 2009 at 04:52
Sir,
Once the police has been registered the FIR on 06-Mar-2005, and Submit charge, police authority has been to file charge sheet in court, on 30-Jan2009.
Accuse has charge in FIR IPC 302/448/149/148/147/27 ARMS ACT and
According to FIR he is member of mob.,
Please clearly me that person if eligible for Government jobs. That case He can face problem in getting Government jobs. Or not. What is law Government jobs for that condition.
Ashu
26 September 2009 at 23:12
can any insured person get back the policy amount after three years even after policy lapsed due to non payment of premium .....if any can you suggest me any supreme court judgment
kamala
26 September 2009 at 23:05
can a bank issue SARFEASI notice in the name of the deceased person
Can a bank insist on a sucession certificate to transfer the loan in hte name of wife
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
creation of website
R/Members
A contract was effected in between me and a co. namelyIPB Infosys for creation of website of my institution for which total amount Rs. 30000/-was paid in advance but even after repeatred written /oral requests co. has not created/prepared/launched my webside & finally demanded Rs. 20000/-more for creation of website,now i have hired services of another co. which has prepared/launched my webside some day prior.now i want to file a consumer complaint,am i fall in consumer defination further this act of co. falls in deficiency of services or notr. plz guide.With Regards