Shyam Ji Srivastava
14 August 2009 at 17:59
Under SERFACIE ACT Civil Court has got NO power to entertain any suit, but in a case under this Act one of the Senior Civil Judge has granted INJUNCTION and stayed Auction Proceeding. However Civil Court Bars under Section 34 of this Act and also any person who is annoyed from the proceeding under this Act may file Appeal before DRT. But Senior Civil Judge granted Injunction.
Anyone can provide any CITATION that civil court can not entertain suit which is subject matter under this Act. Please help earliest.
Thanks
Shyam Ji Srivastva
Advocate
Rajesh Rathod
14 August 2009 at 17:17
Hello Friends,
Can anyone please tell me what does solicitor means? how can we become solicitor?
What are the responsibility of solicitor?
Thanks in advance.
Mahendra
14 August 2009 at 16:58
dear sir i wanted to take admission in diploma in labour welfare what are the procedures & collages
laxmi
14 August 2009 at 16:51
I asked you people in las quiry. that my brother is trying to capture all property in his name. I simply want to know if he did will his name what should i do. since i really do not want property share but i want my elder brother who is still unmarried since my brother know if he married definetly her wife can demand on his behalf. since he is uneducated and he sent out from family for last 15 year now my brother is 45 year old.whatever he earn he sent money to them AND his future is in dark. what action to be taken in this regard SINCE PARENT IS VERY OLD AGE 83 AND 75 ,
laxmI
B.K.GUPTA...
14 August 2009 at 16:21
GOVT HAS EMPOWERED UIT & MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES TO SELL ITS LAND.AS THE AUCTIONS ARE HELD ONLY OF A FEW PLOTS THE RATES GO SPIRALLY HIGHER.MOSTLY INVESTORS TAKE PART IN SUCH AUCTIONS.LEARNED ADVOCATES ARE REQUESTED TO TAKE SOME STEPS.
kirtirani sole
14 August 2009 at 16:13
What is the difference between Judge & Jury?
TARUN JAIN
14 August 2009 at 16:13
A private limited company who is making profits since incorporation, has not declared any dividend.
Now, the Company wants to issue bonus shares using credit balance lying in Profit & Loss Account.
Can the Company do so?
If Yes, please explain the tax implication also.
Thanks & Regards
B.K.GUPTA...
14 August 2009 at 15:59
STATE GOVT. PERMITTED REULARISATION OF PLOT PURCHASED IN AUCTION FROM UIT AFTER AUTOMATIC CANCELLATION.BUT,IN THE MEANTIME THE SCHEME WAS TRANSFERRED TO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL.ALTHOUGH THE MINISTER IS SAME MUNICIPAL COUNCIL IS TAKING PLEA THAT ORDERS OF URBAN DEVELOPEMENT ARE NOT BINDING ON THEM.FIRST APPELLATE COURT ALSO ACCEPTED THEIR SUBMISSION ON A CITATION OF TRANSFER MATTER OF A LDC FROM UIT TO MUNICIPAL COUNCIL.ALTHOUGH SECOND APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BUT AS AT ADMISSION STAGE ONLY A FEW SECONDS ARE ALLOWED I AM AFRAID OF IT. ANY REMEDY?PERVERSE FINDINGS ARE ALSO THERE.
R.K.MURARKA
14 August 2009 at 12:35
I wanted to have an exper opinon for the following querries. In deed of surrender signed by my father for self and on behalf of his brothers reliquishing the right of ancestral property without any consideratin. He had not reliquinshed the right as karata of his family i.e. myself,my wife and two daughters. In the deed of relinquishment I have signed as a witness in the deed. Some of the lawyers state that by signing the witness you have nt given up your rights in the ancestral property and more than 50% states that by signing as a witness you have only witnesseth the signature of your father who had signed before you and dinot give the right of your ancestral properties. I wanted to have an expert opinion with latest supreme court judgement that by signing as witness does not mean that I have given up my right in the property. Can you suggest whether I have given right,title,interest in the property or I have signed as a witness to my gfathers signature.I want your expert opinion.If there is any charge I will pay for the supreme Court rulings. Await your reply
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Notice of Motion
If there is an Order passed by chief justice of High court disposing of the writ petition saying that petitioners representations shall be considered but time is not specified n v file a notice of motion to expedite the proceedings....is this notice of motion in writ petition which is disposed of maintainable n if yes under which rule,act,authority or judgment???
PLZ answer the query at the earliest....i ll b very much obliged.Thank U.