Sir/madam,
My sister who has husband & a son died in an accident. We are christian by religion. I would like to know whether my mother can be considered as one of her legal heir or not
sir ,
good evening
i want tell full story first then i will ask suggestion from you .
story of the case- sir near my home there is a telecom tower in which a tower guard lives . Tower guard and my brother are friend and both preparing for govt. job. in feb 2015 my brother and tower guard was doing study in the tower. Some boys of near village came in tower and demanded Diesel oil . Tower guard denied to give diesel .then they started beating tower guard my brother tried to stop fighting . In fighting tower guard and three boys injured. in meanwhile father of a boy who was injured in clash told to my brother and tower guard that he will end their future . He went police station and filled a FIR . He belongs to a political back ground . In the pressure of political approach SHO booked my brother and tower guard under IPC 307.A counter FIR was filled by our side but police registered case under IPC 386 . My brother and tower guard sent to jail . After 22 days they got bell from CJM. When we approach SP of my district regarding this case he ordered Dy Sp to look into the matter , then Dy sp Self came in tower and remarked in his supervision that incident spot was Tower. In the case diary IO of this case also remarked that incident spot was Tower. In medical report it was mentioned that injury was normal.It has passed two year now no initiative has been taken by other side regarding this case. When i approach SHO regarding this case before ten days he told me that don't worry other side is not interested in this case so it will automatically end.
sir my query are-
(1) Was the SHO speaking truth ?
(2) What should do now?
(3) If my brother got selected in govt. job can this case affect?
(4) Please suggest me
Thanking you sir
Sir, My grandfather and his two brothers had separated their joint family properties and executed partition deed in the year 1935, by then they lived independently. After 1935 my grandfather independently purchased some properties with his personal income earned by business, we have much documentary evidence for the same. All the properties which he purchased after 1935 sold independently by himself since 1944 to 1982 except three items, out of that two items without my grandfather knowledge his elder brother executed Gift Deed in favour of his daughter and son-in-law on 1986 mentioning wrongly that he has 1/3 share in said two items, another item he has not claimed the entire land in said two items enjoying and possessing by my grandfather and us only since 1938 by paying land revenue tax to Govt. under our personal Patta, still gift items our names are continuing in revenue records since 1938. The donor and his sons not mentioned said gift items in their regd. partition on 1955 where they admitted partition among my grandfather and his brothers took place in the 1935. Donor did not claimed gift lands filed before land ceiling tribunals. Donees and Donor never in possession at any time. After demise of my grandfather in 1987, the legal heir of my grandfather got (regd) partitioned including said gift items in 1989. My grandfather and my father mortgaged (regd) entire land in said gift items on 1969 to Ag. Bank. The legal heirs of deceased donees filed suit for declaration of title and right on 2005 in the trail court of A.P. against us, trial going on. Kindly suggest your valuable suggestions with latest Supreme Court judgments regards. (MODIFIED)
Hello to all , i give cheque of 50k to person as security. and after clear all dues with him, i make stop payment of cheque from online net banking sbi. after 2 month when i check statement, i check that that cheque is bounce by him and bank deduct charges too. my question is -
1. how bank deduct charges if i stop payment already
2. is section 138 is same for both condition, a. cheque is active (not stop payment) and , or b. cheque payment stop and cheque is inactive. but bank bounce.
please help me.
simple thing can anyone deposit cheque that is stop payment already . and bank bounce it and he want to take legal action against me , on this bounce cheque.
hello i take loan of 12 lac from Shivalik Bank by Mortgage my Office in Mall area 210sq ft. Bank do valuation of property and this cost 25 lac and as per bank rule, they give 50% loan to us in jan 2016, our EMI deposit regular but unfortunately after sometime in aug 2016, Mall owner want to relocation all shops and dismental all shops and relocate new shop to us in same premises. We inform to bank but they take no action. because they need only EMI. as our business total loss so we unable to pay EMI, and from apr 2017 bank start sending notices to us. and say account is NPA. but how we pay EMI, we request them to restructure loan but they did not. after sometime in nov 2017, we got notice that they sold office to someone without our presence (as sarfaesi act) at 14.25 lacs and clear all dues of bank, then after 5 day we get call from a person and say please unlock office because they need this for them. and tell us now my queries is -
1. how they can sell without our presence, as to change registry they need thumb impression, ratina scan, and signature.
2. if bank valuate property 24 lac at time of give loan (its in dec 2015), how they can sell in least amount,
3. will person who buy property , should have original registry without change in name or what else.
4. can we pay 12 lac or 14.25 lac to person and take our office back or we again have to buy it.
Dear experts,
I give money to my neighbor in his emergency situation without any agreement. After 2 days he give me written statment in normal white paper and ask me he'll give me my money with in one year.
Now one year is finish when I ask him to return my money he always tell me for wait and he is trying to arrange . What should I do ? Suggest me expects is it any legal option for this situation?
Dear Experts,
Assessment for an Assessee (individual) for AY 2010-11 has been completed u/s 147 in March 2015.
Assessee has filed Appeal with CIT(A) and same is pending as on date.
However now Assessee has once again received notice from ITO u/s 142(1) r.w.s 129 in June 2017 for AY 2010-11.
Since in Appeal - Ground of Appeal contain that notice was not served properly and other things like that the ITO has issued new notice u/s 142(1) for the same matter.
Kindly help me on which ground, section and case law I can challenge the notice?
Thank you in advance.
Dear experts,
I'm belongs to Genral caste if I marry with ST caste girl after marriage which catagory she'll belongs? Genral/ST ?
Succession
Sir/madam,
My sister who has husband & a son died in an accident. We are christian by religion. I would like to know whether my mother can be considered as one of her legal heir or not