Vijay
17 April 2015 at 09:42
Hi all,
I recently paid Rs.100000 for purchase of a flat which cost Rs.3500000 and it is under construction, for a token money we paid Rs.100000, due to ill health and other health conditions iam not in a position to purchase the house.
Went to the Construction company to recover the money, they are rejected to pay the token amount of Rs.100000. I told the construction company to deduct the processing fee and pay the balance amount.
My question is if i go to Consumer forum can i get the advance amount paid Rs.100000.
Please advice.
Thanks
Vijay
ARUN
17 April 2015 at 08:45
DEAR SIR,
I HAVE JOINED CENTRAL GOVT SERVICE IN Dec 2011 AND COVERED UNDER NEW PENSION SCHEME.. IF I JOIN ANY OTHER CENTRAL GOVT ORGANISATION BY GIVING TECHNICAL RESIGNATION, WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS?. PLEASE GUIDE ME. THANKING YOU.
YOURS FAITHFULLY
s k jain
17 April 2015 at 07:58
In a long pending suit for partition family members settled the dispute by agreeing to sell the property and device the sale proceeds as per settlement . High court Delhi decreed the settlement. Does this decree require registration and stamp duty as per total value of property.
kamal krishan
17 April 2015 at 04:27
Sir ,
I had filed acomplaint under Sec 138 on 1-1-2013 of NIA and got the compesation by order of the court from the accused for the offence committed by the accused on 1-02- 2015 .
Sir ,
can I file a separate civil suit for rcovery of the same cheque amount ?
As I understand the compensation / fine given , dischrge the accused from his criminal liabilities only but do not exonerate the civil liabilty .
PL guide .
bornleo
17 April 2015 at 01:54
Dear Sir My question is Will case under trial ipc 408 has any impact on passport request ?
As passport is a important document not only to travel abroad but as a ID too for Job and business point of view. if a person is working in a travel industry or travel business and require passport but he is having a case under trial IPC 408. What will be the impact for issuing a new passport.
naresh chamarthy
17 April 2015 at 00:34
respected sir.iam naresh from hyderabad.i purchased a indipendent house from bank.i paid all total money .they issues sale certificate also.but the defaulter apporched drt.drt given docket order.please advice me.how safe i'm.
docket order dt 08-01-2015.
This application is filed in -------------
for stay of all futher proceedings including the delivery of the physical possession of the sehedur property/confirmation of the e-action cum sale notice on the ground that the applicant thought obtained interim order in failed to comply the order as he could not mobilize the required amount to deposit as per the conditional order and as such the respondent bank proceededfuther andd issued the action sale notice and conducted the action of the sehedule property but without following the due process of law and as such the respondent bank canot proceed futher and hence for the grant of stay order.
but the respondent bank opposed the petition srongly by submiting throught their advocate while requesting time for filling of detail counter having filed of the material documents and contended that,it is the third round of litigation of the applicant and has no respect to the court of law and used to file number o appication for the grant of stay and later failed to comply with the conditional imposed at the time of granting the stay order since the purpose ever and similarly failed the present S.A
along with I.A seeking for the interim order.
admited the S.A filed by the applicant challenging the earlier sale notice was dismissed by the holding with the respondent bank has not commited any irregulatiesand since followed the procedure as mandated by rule 8(1)(2) and(6) of security act rules. in the said S.A the applicant obtained interim orders but on condition to deposit cretain amount.but the applicant fails to comply the same said interim orders and ultimately the said S.A was dissmissed on merlts.the applicant who failed to comply the same said orders,also filed W.Ps. before High court of judicature at Hyderabad and ultimately withdrawn the W.Ps. WHEN the respondent bank proceeded further by lssuing the E-auction sale notice dated:16.02.2015 fixing the auction of the schedule property dated:23.03.2015 and conducted the auction of the schedule property dated 23.03.2015 again the applicant filed the present S.A challenging the same said proceedings and wanted to take interim orders for the stay of futher proceedings in pursuance to the auction conducted on 23.03.2015 against the schedule property by questioning the procedure adopted by the respondent bank since not issued notice of 30 days for sale as required under rule 8 (6).but already the respondent bank issued the notice as under rule 8 (6) and was already challenged by the applicant by filling the and the said S.A was dismissed by upholding the procedure adopted by the respondent bank as correct and not found any deviations the respondent bank issued a fresh E-auction sale notice in pursuance tothe same said notice issued under rule 8 (6) and therefore it shall be deemed that the respondent bank rightly followed the procedure and there is no necessity to issue any fresh notic under rule 8 (6) in view of orders in S.A 605 of 2013. the respondent bank prima facie followed procedure as mandated by rule 8 (6) and 9 (1) and in such circumstances the respondent bank since already conducted auction of the schedule property it is also not prudent and safe to safe to stall the further proceedings including the confirmation of sale and issuing of sale certificate and if at all there are any lapses inadopting the procedure in issuing the sale certificate the same may be challenged in the main S.A and it subject to the result of the S.A therefore there is no necessity to grant any inerim stay of further proceedings to be initiated by the respondent bank in pursuance to the E-auction notice dated:16.02.2015 including the conducting of auction of the schedule property for counter and hearing call no 22.04.2015.
in case applicant ready to to pay total out standing amount at 22/04/2015.that about my sale certificate.bank is ready to do registation subject to S.A pending.
vijay
17 April 2015 at 00:15
DEAR SIR, I NEED TO KNOW THE VALIDITY PERIOD FOR THE ORDER ISSUED BY STATE GOVT. ABOUT DELEGATION OF POWERS ISSUED IN 1993.THERAFTER STATE GOVT. DID NOT ISSUED OR REVISED THESE ORDERS CIRCULATED BY SECRETARY IN 1993.
WHETHER THESE ORDERS ARE STILL VALID AFTER A PASSAGE OF 21 YEARS.
ANSWER SHOULD BE SUPPORTED BY PROVISIONS OR BY ACT OR CITATION. VIJAY
mayankjain
16 April 2015 at 23:57
Hello
I am very new to this field and therefore need of some guidance.
I want to know whether there is any weekend law college from where one can pursue llb.
If yes, then whether these weekend colleges are recognized by bar council of india
Thank you
Ramesh Chand Bairagi
16 April 2015 at 22:51
My father comes to Delhi from UP, 50 yrs ago and now we are resident of Delhi. After so many years later, we found our Great Grandfather had a agricultural land in UP (Fard showing that). But the problem is that we don't have any document which showing relation with our great grandfather. My Great Grandfather had only one son (my grandfather) and who had two son ( my father and my uncle only ) and my father had died in an accident and my uncle still alive. So, please show me/us the way to claim that land to register in our names.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Change name
hello..
can you please describe me the procedure to change the name in detail and how much time this process takes.
thanku..