CASE LAW ON CONEMPT OF COURT LIMITATION
Adinath@Avinash Patil
(Querist) 13 October 2009
This query is : Resolved
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT SS 2[B]AND20---
CONTINUING CONTEMPT--PETITION FILED ON 4TH JULY 2002 ALLEGING THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE CREATED THIRD PARTY INTEREST IN SUIT PREMISES IN BRACH OF INJUNCTION GRNTED BY COURT ON 24 TH JUNE 1993- PETITIONER IN AFFIDAVIT FILED BEFORE SMALL CAUSES COURT ON 13 TH DECEMBER,2000 DEPOSED ABOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE CREATION OF THE THIRD PARTY INTEREST-HELD, THE ACT IS COMPLETED BY THE DEFENDANTS AND IS NOT A CONTINUING WRONG--LIMITATION WOULD HAVE TO BE RECKONED FROM THE DATE OF KNOLEDGE ACQUIRED BY THE PETITIONER IN RELATION TO EXISTENCE OF THAT FACT --PETITION IS TIME BARRED BY LIMITATION.
MAHENDRA BUILDERS V/S PARVEZ GHASWALA AND OTHERS.
CONTEMPT PETITION 282/2002 DECIDED ON 31/03/2006[BOMBAY]
MAHARASHTRA LAW JURNOL 2006[3]668.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 14 October 2009
Adinath Sir is performing real duty to inform we youngsters about the depth of law. I admire u sir.
