Caveat by Respondent-Husband in Fam Court before his review petition on order passed on Sec24 HMA.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 10 December 2010 This query is : Resolved
Isn't the caveat a formal way to give notice/warning to opposite party?

Can't Respondent-husband file caveat such as "Let the Petitioner-wife be...aware of 'impending/in the offing and almost certain'....an enquiry and a complaint against wife (unless she admits her lies and corrects her mistakes during 'review' at the Fam. court)....

in regards to....

1. Perjury and
2. Tax evasion which would make wife pay 30% tax +interest + 100% in fine.

committed by Petitioner-wife.

This is due to the resons that wife won the interim maint..using lies and concealment of information ....the proof of which was possible to produce by the husband.....in the era of computerization!! and it was reasonable from the Husband to expect his wife to not to commit such a blunder audaciously and show scant regard/respect/fear of judiciary.

Or Should it be 'Notice to admit facts' instead of a Caveat, filed alongwith 'review' petition?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 10 December 2010
It is better to file caveat in the present matter.

s.subramanian (Expert) 10 December 2010
yes

M V Gupta (Expert) 11 December 2010
The query as posed is unintelligible and confusing. Caveats are filed in a court where a suit is filed or suspected to be filed, requesting the court not to pass any interim or other orders without hearing the person filing the caveat. It is a notice to the court, copy served on the party who has filed the suit or is about to file the suit.Please see Section148A of the CPC.

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 12 December 2010
yes

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries