Civil matter
Dhana Kaleswar
(Querist) 09 March 2012
This query is : Resolved
My name is Kiran I am A CA Pursuant and a Finance Professional
My case is :
My cousin Who joined an Engineering college 2008 in B. Tech Program in 2008 and he got through the first three years. and if every thing were gone good he ill complete his b.tech this march (2012 march) but his fate gone wrong track. his father who is a VRO (government employee) dies of some decease in 2011 Aug. after his father died he has to complete some formalities on behalf of his mother due to this he didnt go to college and he is doing some private job for his family expenses with out going to college. now he is in no position to pay forth year fee and complete his B.Tech program. now to apply for some other jobs he need his 10+2 certificates which were given to the Engineering college when he joined the B.Tech. now the College Management is restricting him to take his certificates. they are saying that he has to pay forth year fee which costs him 55,000 and collect the certificates even he dint go to college for forth year. some one please guide me to help him.
Can Anyone see this matter as the college Management is abstracting collaterally the right to live and right to education by just pressuring my cousin to pay the forth year fee.
why cant the courts see the matter in such a way that the management is going to restrict the boy in doing the job for his livelihood which aims to RIGHT TO LIVE.
why cant the courts are or us see this matter that the management is Pressuring for the fee for which it just not given the couching. for which we can file case in Consumer court.
Why cant courts understand that the victim and his mother who are "HOLDER IN DUE COURSE" at the time of signing on the addmission application for not leaving the college until the course completed.
because at the time of signing on application or at the time of joining the college no management could say " the boy should stay with the college until he completed his course". they think this is implied conditions so not necessary to tell either the student or the parent.
so that the college Management had not told about the restriction of leaving the college in any condition. they are all implied so how the student or his illiterate parents could know the implied condition of the College Management.
can we file a writ not in the consumer courts in Civil court as the Management had not told about the restrictions of leaving so the boy is eligible for the originals.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 09 March 2012
You had raised the same query some days ago which was duly replied and you have again put the same query before the same experts so you can imagine the replies.
Why do you not help your cousin and go to college and settle the matter at your own end?
Nothing is going to happen unless you personally go and meet the management and put the entire facts before them and pray to take a lineint view over the whole matter and accordingly settle the matter.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 09 March 2012
repeated queries are not being replied by experts .
SONI KARTIK
(Expert) 11 March 2012
Dear, why are you vesting your and our time and energy ? when the experts had advised you better and promptly.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 11 March 2012
YOUR NAME ID Dhana OR KIRAN??
IF REPEATED qUERY WE NEED NOT REPLY.
