Confused by advocates so need further guidance?

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 30 September 2024 This query is : Resolved
Met in person and paid Consulting fees as well but it resulted in diverse opinions so please help answer below queries?
1) On earlier occasions we tenant's matter against notorious landlords was dealt with by Bombay High Court resulting in Consent Terms in 2013. Landlords severely and deliberately defaulted and 1) Altered floor plan for my tenament from 1 BHK to 1 RK with toilet in the kitchen and 2) Reduced the carpet area from 330 sqft to 300 sqft which is not acceptable to us.
besides delaying the redevelopment work for by 8 years.
While one advocate opined to file A) Claim in City Civil Court (Not in the High Court) & B) Criminal Case in Magistrate's Court for Cheating, Fraud and murder threats as Police due corruption registered mere NC and not FIR
Other advocate suggested to file 1) Case with RERA and 2) Criminal Case in Magistrate's Court.
Kindly suggest correct way and clear doubts.
TIA.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 30 September 2024
You have consulted many advocates and have not taken any action as suggested.
Therefore without knowing the background history properly including the orders passed by high court any opinion rendered here may also appear as misguidance to you.
Better decide based on your own prudence.

kavksatyanarayana (Expert) 30 September 2024
You have consulted many advocates but you have not believed them. And you are saying the landlords are notorias then you have to think one advocate and proceed with his guidance.

P. Venu (Expert) 22 October 2024
The facts, as posted, are confused by subjective opinions.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries