Consumer case
Suresh
(Querist) 08 July 2012
This query is : Resolved
HI I am fighting a consumer case against a prominent and influential builder since April 2008 and till date no conclusion has taken place. I have to quarrel with my advocate always and now the advocate had given me the copy of the docket to show me that he is not at wrong side. Please advice me by going through the docket extract which i had typed it by seeing the attested copy whether any UN-due interference is there by the opposite parties to thwart my effort and to drag the proceedings. Please guide me the way out. Thanks
EXTACT OF THE DOCKET OF THE STATE CONSUMER FORUM
13.05.2008> ADMIT & NOTICE -CALL ON 4.9.2008.
04.09.2008> OP2 SERVED-NO REP.FOR R1&R2 -OP2 SERVED CALLED ABSENT-FNTO R1&R2 (pvt) CALL ON 18.9.2008.
18.09.2008> FN TO R1 BY PRIVATE ACK FILED-R1NOTICE SERVED-R1CALLED ABSENT-P/A OF COMP. CALL ON 16.10.08.
16.10.2008> P/A OF COMPL.FILED –CALL ON 4.11.08.
04.11.2008> ENQUIRY 14.11.2008.
14.11.2008> MEMO FILED BY THE COUNSEL FOR COMPL.-PUT BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER -CALL ON 18.11.08.
18.11.2008> THE PET.IS DIRECTED TO TAKE PVT.NOTICE OF OP’S RETURNABLE BY GIVING CLEAR DATE-C/ON 10.12.08.
10.12.2008> AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE FILED-OP2 SERVED ABSENT-M/S.XY ASSOCIATES FILED VAKALAT FOR OP1-FOR
VERSION IF ANY-CALL ON 7.1.09.
07.01.2009 TO 12.08.2009> NO SITTING- CALL ON 17.09.09.
17.09.2009> WRITTEN VERSION OP1-WRITTEN VERSION OP1 AS LAST CHANCE-CALL ON 05.10.09.
05.10.2009> WRITTEN VERSION OP1-NO REPRESENTATION FOR OP1-WRITTEN VERSION OF OP1 NOT FILED-P/A OF
COMPL.ALREADY FILED ON 16.10.08-FOR REQUEST OF COMPL.COUNSEL -FOR ENQUIRY PBC- C/ON 6.11.09.
06.11.2009> P/A OF COMPL.FILED-ENQUIRY 18.12-OFFICE IS DIRECTED TO ISSUE NOTICE TO THE OP1-PVT.NOTICE ALSO
PERMITTED-CALL ON 18.12.09-----BY PRESIDENT.
18.12.2009> ACK FILED- M/S.XY ASSOCIATES FILED VAKALAT FOR OP1-NO SITTING-REPOSTED 05.02.2010.
05.02.2010> NO SITTING-REPOSTED 23.03.2010.
23.03.2010> ARGUMENTS-NO REPRESENTATION FOR OP1-THOUGH M/S.XY ASSO. FILED VAKALAT FOR OP1-AS SEEN
FROM THE RECORDS P/A OF OP1 ALSO NOT FILED. FOR FILLING OF P/A OF OP1-C/ON20.04---BY PRESIDENT.
20.04.2010> P/A OF OP1(FINAL)NOT FILED-FOR ARGUMENTS ADJ TO 25.6.2010----BY PRESIDENT
25.06.2010> W/A FILED BY THE COMPL.ON 21.4.10 WITH THE SECTION-ARGUMENTS-M/s.SS ASSOCIATES FILED
VAKALAT FOR OP2-FOR FILLINGW/VOF OP2-C/ON16.7.10(F).
16.07.2010> FOR FILLING W/V OF OP2(F)-OP1VERSION NOT FILED-VERSION OF OP2FILED-OP1CALLED ABSENT AND SET
EXPARTE-P/A AND W/A OF OP2 BY 25.8.10.
25.08.2010> P/A OF COMPL.,P/A OF OP2 FILED-P/AOF OP1 AND W/V NOT FILED-W/V OF OP2 FILED-AT REQUEST OF OP2
P/A & W/A BY 28.9.10.
28.09.2010> P/A FILED OP2,W/A-P/AOF OP2 WITH DOCS(7) FILED-FOR W/A OF OP2-CALL ON 3.12.10.
03.12.2010> W/A OF OP2 FILED-FOR ENQUIRY 10.2.11.
10.02.2011> ENQUIRY – 5.4.2011
05.04.2011> BEFORE THE BENCH CALL ON 6.5.11
06.05.2011> P/A OF COMPL.&OP2 ALREADY FILED-OP1ALREADY SET EXPARTE ON 16.7.10-W/V OF OP1 NOT FILED FROM
5.10.09-P/A OF OP1 NOT FILED FROM 20.1.10-PETS.TO ADDL.DOCS-3 FILED BY PET/COMPL.IN THE SECTION
ON 6.4.11-COUNSEL OP2 REQUESTED BY TOMORROW ADDL.DOCS AND COUNTEROP2-FOR APPEARANCE
OF OP1 OR TO SET EXPARTE.
07.06.2011> FOR APPEAR. OF OP1 OR TO SET EXPARTE-W/V & P/A OF OP1 NOT FILED-MP162/11 IS PENDING-C/O.5.7
05.07.2011> M.P.162/11 IS PENDING-W/V&P/A OF OP1 NOT FILED- FOR APPEARANCE OF OP1 OR TO SET EXPARTE-OP1
CALLED ABSENT-SET EXPARTE-CALL ON 4.8.11.
04.08.11> M.P.162/11 & 206/11 ARE PENDING-CALL ON 13.9.11.
13.09.11> M.P.162/11 & 206/11 ARE ALLOWED-FOR W/A ARGUMENTS BOTH SIED-CALL ON 1.11.11.
01.11.11> FOR W/A OF BOTH SIDE-(OP1 ALREADY SET EXPARTE ON 16.7.10 & 5.7.11) CALL ON 16.12.11.
16.12.11> W/A COMPL. & OP2 ALREADY FILED ON 21.6.10 & 3.12.10--(OP1 ALREADY SET EXPARTE ON 16.7.10 &
5.7.11)-ADDL.P/A FILED BY THE COMPL.BEFORE REGISTRY ON 28.11.11 DOCS (3)-PET.FOR CONDONE THE
DELAY SETASIDE THE EXPARTE & P/A OF OP1 FILED BEFORE REGISTRY ON 2.12.11-ADDL.P.A .OF DOCS.
ALONG WITH 3 DOCS FILED-PET.PENDING-COMPL.&OP1 & OP2 REPRESENTS BY COUNSELS- C/ ON 6.1.12.
06.01.12> BOTH SIDE REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL CALL ON 10.2.12.
10.02.12> M.P.NOS.325/12,356/11&357/11 ARE PENDING CALL ON 28.2.12.
28.02.12> M.P.325/12,356/11,357/11 ARE PENDING.M.P.356/11 ALLOWED-M.P.357/11&2/12 PENDING-C/O 16.3.12.
16.03.12> M.P.357/11 & 2/12 ARE DISMISSED-FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS-CALL ON 27.4.12.
27.04.12> MARKING OF DOCUMENTS-CALL ON 21.6.12.
21.06.12> MARKING OF DOCUMENTS – PETITIONS FILED BY OP1 FOR SETTTING ASIDE EXPARTE-CALL ON 4.7.12
04.07.12> CALL ON 17.7.12.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 08 July 2012
how can you blame the advocate . it appears exparte order was passed in your favour and application has been taken BY OP for setting aside exparte order .
judical process takes time . you are luckjy your advocate did not return the brief in the wake of accusations made by you any other advocate would have told you bbrief some other lawyer
ashutosh mishra
(Expert) 08 July 2012
i am too little to understand your query.
