Wife is working in accenture how to prove her income
Ashish
(Querist) 25 October 2017
This query is : Resolved
My wife left me 2.5 years before, she lived with me very short duration 6 months (no child born out of this wedlock), last 2 years i tried to bring her back but she denied to return, recently she filed divorce and she applied for HMA 24, in her application she wrote that she is not working anywhere and my husband earns 1.5 lakh per month (completely fake fact).
I come to know by her close relatives she is planning for second marriage so she filed for divorce with hma 24 by fake facts so that because of monthly maintenance i will be ready for mutual divorce by paying settlement money. I know she is working in Accenture software company and earning decent salary so i applied for order 11 rule 14 application to summon her employer to prove my point i have provide her employment details & video while entering in Accenture office building, but judge reject my application and asking to produce her income documents otherwise i will order interim maintenance, he is saying i will order interim if you do not have her earning proof & you can later prove things during cross examining her.
My query is that there any other way to convince judge to summon her employer as i have solid proof of her employment but do not have proof to prove her income in court, out of court she is laughing on me and forcing to pay lumpsum settlement money or ready to pay interim money, i am not in a position to pay her and her earning is very good (40-50k range) but she is taking advantage of this situation and not providing her income details to court.
I have her pan card details with me is there any way to prove her income, we tried to convince judge to invite any representative of her company which will resolve this issue with in a second by exposing her lie in court but judge is not allowing for it too, Is there any way to get relief in same court.
People suggesting many ways like take help of detective services but before going in wrong direction i want to know still is there any legal way left to get justice by our law.
Ashish
(Querist) 25 October 2017
please advice on this issue.
Ashish
(Querist) 25 October 2017
please advice on this issue.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 26 October 2017
Consult some detective agency to find out conclusive evidence(s) qua her employment and submit it to the Court.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 26 October 2017
If you do not like my response do not press "thank" button and save your "thanks" for some impersonating expert who is eager to earn and accumulate marks/thanks
Vijay Raj Mahajan
(Expert) 26 October 2017
Try to get her salary details from her company Accenture through some sources and mention those to the presiding judge of the Family Court by way of your affidavit.
The judge cannot ignore your affidavit as proof of her income and if he do so you can move the High Court in revision against the order of the Family Court.
Your application for summoning her official records to prove her income also be placed on record of the court because when you file revision petition in High Court, the case file of the Family Court will be summoned there and it should have the application under O 11 R 14 CPC for summoning her salary accounts.
The Family Court judge cannot refuse your defence on flimsy grounds.
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 26 October 2017
Through filing an RTI application u/s 6(1) of RTI Act to the concerned PIO you can get details of her salary if you know the company she works for,her name and her designation-etc.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 26 October 2017
give application to court to summon his employer with salary details
Azhagananth
(Expert) 26 October 2017
Just pay witness batta to the company to produce the working details of her.... Process and batta fee will be less than Rs.30 and the Traveling allowance to the tune of Rs.300/- minimum.. if the company receives summon court their, bounded to produce the seeked documents before court..
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 26 October 2017
iF YOU appreciate my above answer please give me likes.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 26 October 2017
M/s Accenture must be covered by Shops & Estbs Act of the state and as per Shops & Estbs Rules prescribed under Shops & Estbs Act, IT has to submit various registers on payouts to employee including wages, OT etc .......
Check with Inspectorate....in the state.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 26 October 2017
I am sending you a few links.
Discuss with your counsel and/or act on your own.
Agreed with observations of Mr. Vijay Raj Mahajan observation on Presiding Officer.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 26 October 2017
I am sending you a few links.
Discuss with your counsel and/or act on your own.
Agreed with observations of Mr. Vijay Raj Mahajan observation on Presiding Officer.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 26 October 2017
Agree with the advice from expert Vijay Raj Mahajan.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 27 October 2017
The impersonating expert is not aware (and proved) about the applicability of provisions of the Right to Information Act , 2005 wherein the employer of queriest i.e., Accenture Software Company is not a "public authority" accordingly the company is not bound to provide necessary information.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 27 October 2017
However, it is the decision of the author that he may or may not press "thanks" button in favour of impersonating respondent/ so-called expert lacking legal knowledge and misguiding .
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 17 November 2017
Humbly and respectfully differ with the comments from learned expert Dr. J.C. Vashishta.
Expert has right to differ with the advice from an expert, should express views accordingly.
should avoid personal comments till self is attacked by that expert through personal comments.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 17 November 2017
IT=@PSD and all of IT's multiple fake ID's (some of which are blackened/blocked/shunted out) won't agree as IT=@PSD from Day1 has been doing this only at LCI and any other portal and claiming everywhere that IT=@PSD is something at LCI..............to pose to allure unsuspecting querists...........
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
(Expert) 18 November 2017
I could not understand how above views of Mr Kumar Doab will help he querist.
Guest
(Expert) 18 November 2017
@ Dr. J.C Vashista;
AND
@Sudhir Kumar,
So, ultimately an impersonating expert, Mr. Kumar Doab has made clear for whom he has been using his secret code of "IT=@PSD" for Dr. J.C. Vashista and Shri Sudhir Kumar, as both of them differed with the views of Mr. Kumar Doab.
Mr. Kumar Doab has stated, "IT=@PSD and all of IT's multiple fake ID's (some of which are blackened/blocked/shunted out) WON'T AGREE as IT=@PSD from Day1 has been doing this only at LCI and any other portal and claiming everywhere that IT=@PSD is something at LCI"
Although Dr. J.C. Vashista has not directly named Mr. Kumar Doab, but Shri Sudhir Kumar has clearly disagreed with Mr. Kumar Doab in saying, "I could not understand how above views of Mr. Kumar Doab will help the querist."
So, Mr. Kumar Doab made clear for whom he uses his secret code word.
CONGRATULATIONS TO BOTH OF THEM.
An impersonating fake expert has declared both of them having their fake ID. SO, IT IS ONLY UP TO THE EXPERTS TO CLARIFY.
ANYWAY Mr. KUMAR DOAB HAS DEMONSTRATED THE STATE OF HIS UNSOUND MIND VERY OPENLY BY MAKING VAGUE AND IRRELEVANT POSTS.
MAY GOD SAVE HIM FROM HIS DETERIORATING MENTAL HEALTH.
BY THE WAY, WHAT WAS SECRET THAT HE HAS TO SEND SOME LINK SECRETLY THROUGH PM ONLY AND NOT POSTED HERE?
WAS HE REALLY AFRAID OF BEING RIDICULED OPENLY FOR MISLEADING THE QUERIST?
When he has already sent some links secretly to through PM, what was the need of making mention on the thread?
Anyway, he has not lost the opportunity to play a number game to add to his credit without any specific advice to the querist.
Guest
(Expert) 18 November 2017
@ Dr. J.C. Vashista,
From the advice of Mr. Rajendra K Goyal, a child of merely 2 years of age (as revealed from his picture), don't you feel that India has leaped much forward than even the most advance countries, like USA, UK or Japan, that even an infant Indian child of merely 2 years of age has become so talented that he has tried to teach lessons of ethics even to professionally experienced senior citizens, like you!
It seems to be quite a fit case for grant of a special award by the President of India. At least the experts should appreciate a great achievement of Mr. Rajendra K Goyal!
IT IS ALSO A RARE CASE OF HIS ACHIEVEMENT THAT HE BECAME EXPERT AT LCI EVEN THREE YEARS BEFORE HIS BIRTH, I.E., IN AUGUST 2012, WHILE THE BIRTH OF THE PHOTOGRAPHED CHILD MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED SOME TIME IN 2015 ONLY!
Guest
(Expert) 18 November 2017
Bravo, what a sensational revelation & analysis of a character made by Mr. Jigyasu!
But, Mr. Jigyasu should clearly understand that whatsoever effort he may make to awaken such an expert (may be fake), he is of such a stubborn nature that he would never appear with his real picture to be seen by the viewers. Probably, like Mr. Kumar Doab, he may also be afraid of getting identified due to his past as well as present misdeeds.
