Sec 354 ipc
lakshminarayana prathypaty
(Querist) 20 November 2017
This query is : Resolved
wife and son discharged from case and there is only circumtential evidence for husband.
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 21 November 2017
if CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS STRONG OR ALL THE CHAIN OF EVENTS LEAD TO OR CONNECT TO ONE ANOTHER LEADING TO YOUR HUSBANDS INNOCENCE IN THE CRIME YOUR HUSBAND ALSO WOULD GET DISCHARGED. GOOD LUCK!
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 21 November 2017
I wrote a correct reply. If you appreciate my answer to your query you please give me likes.
Guest
(Expert) 21 November 2017
@Ms. Usha Kapoor,
How your reply can be treated as correct, when you have not been able to understand even the basics of the question?
The query of the querist clearly reveals that the circumstantial evidence goes against the husband, where his wife and son have been discharged.
Not only that you have treated MR. Laxkshinarayana, as the WIFE of HIS husband?
So, in what context your reply can be considered as correct, where you have asked for a "LIKE" claiming your reply to be correct.
AT LEAST THE QUESTION WAS EXPECTED TO HAVE BEEN READ AND UNDERSTOOD CORRECTLY.
Anyway, no objection, if the author of the question, who is also LLM qualified, gives you a "like."
Guest
(Expert) 21 November 2017
Apparently, chances of husband do not seem bright.
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 25 November 2017
t Hereafter don' talk to me!You never practiced ON CRIMINAL Side;;IF THE CHAIN OF EVENTS CONNECTED WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A LOGICAL FASHION THEN C9RCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS ACCEPTABLE READ MANY LANDMARK SC DECISIONS IN WHICH ACCUSED WERE ACQUITTED BASED ONLY ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WHEREIN While laying down the law on circumstantial THE CHAIN OF EVENTS WERE CONNECTED WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A LOGICAL FASHION. SUCH EVIDENCE REGARDING CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS ACCEPTABLE., I'don't have anything to do with you. This is the last warning. Read /SC judgements on Circumstantial evidence based on which SC acquitted the accused. I'm not ignorant you people are IGNORANT. you ARE CRYING OVER MY THANKS.IDON'T .EVER TRY TO TALK TOME. i HATE YOU. GET LOST. BASTARD! IN YOUR DELHI ALSO PEOPLE APPRECIATED ME AND DOCTORS OTHER PEOPLE WOULD COMMENT THAT" SMARTEST WE HAVE EVER SEEN". first IMPROVE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND THEN TEACH OTHERS/. iTS CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT YOU ARE JEALOUS ABOUT ME
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 25 November 2017
jiGYASU,
t Hereafter don' talk to me!You never practiced ON CRIMINAL Side;;IF THE CHAIN OF EVENTS CONNECTED WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A LOGICAL FASHION THEN C9RCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS ACCEPTABLE READ MANY LANDMARK SC DECISIONS IN WHICH ACCUSED WERE ACQUITTED BASED ONLY ON CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE WHEREIN While laying down the law on circumstantial THE CHAIN OF EVENTS WERE CONNECTED WITH ONE ANOTHER IN A LOGICAL FASHION. SUCH EVIDENCE REGARDING CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS ACCEPTABLE., I'don't have anything to do with you. This is the last warning. Read /SC judgements on Circumstantial evidence based on which SC acquitted the accused. I'm not ignorant you people are IGNORANT. you ARE CRYING OVER MY THANKS.IDON'T .EVER TRY TO TALK TOME. i HATE YOU. GET LOST. BASTARD! IN YOUR DELHI ALSO PEOPLE APPRECIATED ME AND DOCTORS OTHER PEOPLE WOULD COMMENT THAT" SMARTEST WE HAVE EVER SEEN". first IMPROVE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND THEN TEACH OTHERS/. iTS CRYSTAL CLEAR THAT YOU ARE JEALOUS ABOUT ME
Guest
(Expert) 25 November 2017
@Ms. Usha Kapoor,
Not the question of practice, but the question of commonsense. If you believe, the chain of events are connected with one another in this case, A PERTINENT QUESTION ARISES, HAVE YOU CHECKED THE CHAIN OF EVENTS, WHEN THE QUERIST HAS NOT COME FORWARD WITH EVEN A BIT OF THE BACKGROUND OR THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CASE?
APPARENTLY, YOU MERELY WORK ON SUPPOSITIONS, NOT ON FACTS.
By the way, what do you know about criminal law, when you don't understand the meaning and crime of calling me bastard? Can't you imagine that this single word of your (bastard) utterance for me is quite sufficient to get you put behind bars, as you said "DON'T .EVER TRY TO TALK TOME. i HATE YOU. GET LOST. BASTARD!"? Just think, can you forbid me in anyway from filing a criminal suit against you for my open insult through an open forum that too in writing? I have already taken screen shot of this thread for further course of action, as may be necessary.
About appreciations, begging for "likes" or appreciations can never be termed as the symbol of talent.
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 25 November 2017
I believe in the concept of keep your enemies at bay phylosophy.
Guest
(Expert) 25 November 2017
Kind Attn Ms.Usha Kapoor .Better to mind the words in open forum..You could very well justify your self than using the most abusive words.
Guest
(Expert) 25 November 2017
The Gentle approach of Mr Jigyasu is appreciated.
Guest
(Expert) 25 November 2017
@ Ms. Usha Kapoor,
You have stated, "I believe in the concept of keep your enemies at bay phylosophy," but your senseless actions and utterances that too at an open forum is quite contrary to your belief. These are quite fit to invite your enemies too close to you through the courts of law. You are under misunderstanding that you know the criminal law, but you don't know what the criminal law is and how you are involving yourself in committing criminal offense..
You have used the word "bastard" for me. Just check the meaning from any dictionary and then decide whether this can be said to be your bid to keep your enemies at bay or you are intentionally making others your enemies and then acting in such a rash way that they must come too close to you by getting you fired through the courts of law.
I can understand your physical and mental debilities, but losing some commonsense on your part is not understood, while making senseless utterance at open forums.
