LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

CRPC U/S 391 READ WITH 401

(Querist) 18 April 2009 This query is : Resolved 
OUR LAWYER DID NOT EXHIBITED IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS IN THE TRAIL COURT THOUGH FILED DURING THE COURSE OF VARIOUS HEARINGS AND ALSO THE SESSION COURT DID NOT CONSIDER.NOW WE HAVE MOVED TO HIGHCOURT THRU IA AFTER FILING CRIMINAL REVISION U/S 391 READ WITH 401 TO ENTERTAIN THE DOCUMENTS ALREADY ON RECOERD.
CAN YOU ALL EXPERTS SUGGEST SOME DECISIONS OF SC OR MPHC ENABLING TO QUOTE.TKS
Jaswant Singh (Expert) 18 April 2009
Marking a document exhibt does not proved the documents. To prove a document, the procedure is prescribed under Evidence Act & CPC. Even non marking as exhibit,if otherwise it is proved, shall be considered by the court
JANAK GANDHI (Querist) 19 April 2009
THANKS AN APPLICATION IS FILED U/S 391 BEFORE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT.IS IT MANDATORY TO HEAR THE SAME BEFORE FINAL HEARING AND WHETHER IF ACCUSED PROVES THE TRUTHNESS THAN THE COURT WILL ACCEPT FOR FINAL HEARING?


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :