LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

difference b/w regularisation and reinstatement

(Querist) 03 October 2009 This query is : Resolved 
In an industrial dispute before labour court Lko the LC has decided the case of daily wager who has completed more than one year of conitunuty of service with Mandi Parishad Lucknow The Mandi Parishad has opposed the reference on the basis that the the services of the workman were in a project and he is not entitled for the benefit of section 6 N of UPID Act , 1947
The Labour Court after evidence of the workman closed the case on the basis of a Case with regard to the regularisation of the same department which was based on the case of UMA Devi ( Supra ) holding that the appointment of the daily wager was not in accordance with the due procedure and there fore he is not entitled for any relief . I have decided to move in HC Lko and I have drafted a WP which is attached Please comemnt and suggest me what other to add to succeed in the matter
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 03 October 2009
No attachment found sir.
Adinath@Avinash Patil (Expert) 03 October 2009
NO ATTACHMENT FOUND
Sachin Bhatia (Expert) 04 October 2009
No attachment
tarun goyal (Expert) 04 October 2009
although no attachment found, still my opinion is that the Uma Devi judgment is the comprehensive judgment in the cases dealing with the issue of contract labours and i presume there will be no relief in the high court also. please don't mind.
Sachin Bhatia (Expert) 05 October 2009
How can we comment and suggest without reading the WP?


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :