Doctrine of merger is applicable or not (confused).
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 24 April 2011
This query is : Resolved
(Arising out of Sp. Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3271 OF 2007)
D. VENKATASUBRAMANIAM & ORS. ....................... APPELLANTS
VERSUS
M.K. MOHAN KRISHNAMACHARI & ANR. ................ RESPONDENTS
With
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1767_ OF 2009
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 3269 OF 2007)
ABINESH BABU & ORS. …………………………………… .. APPELLANTS
VERSUS
M.K. MOHAN KRISHNAMACHARI & ANR. ... ………………..RESPONDENTS
can we say it is doctrine of merger of both the cases under one & also the party are also different if not than why 2 no are give that is
Crl No. 3269 Of 2007 & (Crl.) No. 3271 OF 2007. Pls tell me why it is given i have seen also under many civil cases & going confused as a law student.
why this 2 cases are mergerd in one & when can a court considered the above type of cases mergerd. or in short it allows.
Thanks.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 24 April 2011
Yes. You are right. You are quite confusing the "doctrine of merger". Please go through the provisions in your text book as to where the question of doctrine of merger applies. In case you are still not sure, ask your professor. He will surely help you out. As it is I can say, rather you are also realising, that you are confused about the whole doctrine itself. I do not know in which semester you are.
