Duties of Supereme Court
SURESH GODBOLE
(Querist) 16 December 2010
This query is : Resolved
Dear Experts ,
My simple querry to you is can any Court in India become a supervisory authority for a Conducting Agency. As per my view the prime duty of any Court in India is to adjudicate and not investigate.
Will you call it trangressing the authority which has been conferred by the Constitution on Courts.
Secondly , will it not be an aspersion expressed on the independent functioning of the investigating agency . More so Doubts of Politicising the CBI by the existing Govt.
Further, what should be done by the Opposition, People of India , Lawyers and Advocates of India , Supreme Court of India , Social Activist to Cancel all the Licenses Given in 2G Spectrum at 2001 Price in 2008.The Loss must be recovered by cancelling all the existing Licenses given aND RETENDERING.
A cursory look at the Tendering format will show the Govt has a right to cancel any License if Malafide is proved.
It is a fact that Judiciary has traces of Corruption. Also the Judges elevated to the Highest Court are from High Courts who in turn come either from Advocate Quota or Legal channel (Judges of Lower Courts) . Thus , those who are corrupt at lower level and not sanitized, rise to the highest level, but cannot wash the mud already pasted on them permanently on them.
I want all of you may react.
s.subramanian
(Expert) 17 December 2010
Very valid and substantial points to ponder.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 17 December 2010
It is true that the courts duty is not to investigate the case. But, the court can have control over the investigation agency, if they are not performing their duty.
Kirti Kar Tripathi
(Expert) 17 December 2010
Agree, with Mr. Arunagiri. SC can exercise supervisory powers to their actions.
Parthasarathi Loganathan
(Expert) 18 December 2010
Mr.Suresh's points are well taken. It goes to show that only Supreme Court is devoid of corruption in this country. Let that institution be spared protected for the welfare of common man.
