ENCROACHMENT OF SCHEDULE CAST PROPERTY BY COMPANY
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 12 May 2011
This query is : Resolved
I HAVE FILED ORISSA LAND REFORMS CASE u/s23A BEFORE THE SUBCOLLECTOR.I HAVE MADE 3 PERSONS AS O.P IN MY APPLICATION.THE LAW MANAGER HAS SIGNED THE VAKALATNAMA STATING THAT HE IS THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER BUT HE HAS NOT FILED ANY POWER OF ATTORNEY.THE OPPOSIT PATIES HAS NOT SIGNED IN THE VAKALATNAMA.IS IT ACCEPTABLE ? THE SHOW CAUSE IS ALSO NOT SIGNED BY THE OPPOSITE PARTIES NOR THE SIGNATURY OF VAKALATNAMA .IS IT ACCEPTABLE ?
LOOKING FOR YOUR ADVICE PLEASE.
THANKING YOU
Guest
(Expert) 12 May 2011
SIR,
KINDLY NOTE THAT
1.YOU MAY MENTION ALL THESE FACTS AND OBJECT THE APPEARENCE FILED BY SAID PERSON.AS AUTHORITY LETTER IS NOT FILED THEN YOU MAY OBJECT IN YOUR ARGUMENTS AND LET COURT DECIDE.YOU WILL SUCCEED.GOOD LUCK.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 21 May 2011
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ADVISE
YOU WILL BE ASTONISHED THAT THE SAID COMPANY IS A GOVT.OF INDIA COMPANY HASE ENCROACHED A PICE OF LAND BEONGS TO A SCHEDULE CAST PERSON.THE GOVT COMPANY HAS SUBMITED AN APPLICATION BEFORE THE FORESET DEPARTMENT TO OBTAIN DERESERVATION OF FOREST LAND FOR NON FOREST PURPOSE. IN THEIR APPLICATION THEY HAVE SUBMITTED A LAND SCHEDULE WHEREIN THE ABOVE SCHEDULE CAST LAND IS INSERTED IN TO THE FOREST CATAGORY AND GOT THE PERMISSION FOR DESERVATION.THOUGH IN THE RECORD OF RIGHT OF THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT IS STILL SHOWING THE WONERSHIP OF THE ABOVE SCHEDULE CAST PERSON.
PLEASE ADVISE WHAT TO DO?
