ENCROACHMENT OF SCHEDULE CAST PROPERTY BY COMPANY

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 May 2011 This query is : Resolved
I AS PETIOTIONER FILED A PETITION FOR ORISSA LAND REFORMS CASE u/s23A BEFORE THE SUBCOLLECTOR.I HAVE MADE 3 PERSONS AS O.P IN MY APPLICATION.THE LAW MANAGER OF THE OPOSITE PARTIES HAS SIGNED THE VAKALATNAMA STATING THAT HE IS THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER BUT HE HAS NOT FILED ANY POWER OF ATTORNEY.THE OPPOSIT PATIES HAS NOT SIGNED IN THE VAKALATNAMA. IS IT ACCEPTABLE? THE SHOW CAUSE IS OF THE OPPOSITE PARTIES ALSO NOT SIGNED BY THE OPPOSITE PARTIES OR THE SIGNATURY OF VAKALATNAMA .IS IT ACCEPTABLE?
LOOKING FOR YOUR ADVICE PLEASE.
THANKING YOU

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Guest (Expert) 12 May 2011
SIR,
KINDLY REFER THE REPLY SENT TO SIMILAR MATTER.GOOD LUCK.

Bhawani Mahapatra (Expert) 12 May 2011
Sir
As stated by you, if your O.P. is a company, it can represented through a power of attorney holder or through an authorised signatory. Court generally doesn't insists upon to demand for a copy of power of attorney.Its also un-necessary to dispute his authority to file written statement.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries