u/s 307,341,323,506 and 34 IPC.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 12 January 2010
This query is : Resolved
The contents of FIR “ main apne motor cycle per dukan band karke ghar jar aha tha to kareeb rat 8.50 pm ek van mod per khare thi jisme se driver ne mujhe rukne ka eshara kiya .van se teen ladke utre or mujhe marne lage jisme se ek rinku kumar ne chaku se mere sir per bar kiya or dusra manit kumar ne dande se mere baju per bar kiya maine chillaya or shoor machaya etne main mere chacha aa gaye or boo log jate –jate mujhe jan se marne ke dhamke de gaye .Rinku kumar se din ko mere kuch- kaha sune hue thy kyonki rinku kumar ne din ko apne van mere dukan ke samne khare ke thy jis per maine ese van bahan se hatane bar kaha-sune hue thy jiska badla rinku kumar ne mujh per jan leba hamla kiya.” Police has registered a criminal case against two person Rinku Kumar and Manit Kumar u/s 307,341,323,506 and 34 IPC, but there is nothing regarding the third person in all investigation in this case .And as per MLC report of the Doctor there are five injuries on the body of the complainant, injuries nos.2, 3, 4 and 5 are simple in nature but the injury no.1 is grievous in nature i.e. “Swelling present in the left forearm, present about 1cm above the left wrist joint 4”+4”cm tenderness and reddish discoloration of under lung skin, active and passive movements round left wrist joint restricted”. At this case is fixed for C.O.C.Kindly referred the arguable points, latest case law and judgments whether it amounts to u/s 307 IPC or not. Is it covered u/s 326 IPC.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 13 January 2010
If the opinion of dotor has specifically not sought to the effect that the injury no. 1 would certainly lead to danger to life till then section 307 cannot be imposed and it seems that in the given case, this section has hurriedly imposed in FIR itself so better argue at the time of imposition of the charges before concerned court.
