Ni act

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 16 August 2011 This query is : Resolved
Notice u/s 138 issued by complaint advocate.
complaint resided at coimbatore accused resided at salem advocate issued notice from karur. case filed at karur. whether the court had the jurisdiction to sue kindly clarified please

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ajay sethi (Expert) 16 August 2011
merely because notice is issued from karur is not sufficient to entertain complaint at karur . whether registered office of complainant is at karur? whether cheque issued by accused from karur bank?

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 16 August 2011
complaint is nowhere coneect with karur

prabhakar singh (Expert) 16 August 2011
IT IS THE BUNDLE OF FACTS WHICH GIVES REASON TO DECIDE THE JURISDICTION AND NOT A NOTICE ALONE SO BETTER NARRATE THE FULL FACTS TO LET US ASCERTAIN JURISDICTION.

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 16 August 2011
Please go through the SC citation in Heramann electronics case in this matter regarding jurisdiction which I have posted in files section.

Ajay Bansal (Expert) 16 August 2011
Give full facts of matter.

Dr Anil Kumar Singh (Expert) 16 August 2011
From your version it seems that court has registered the case and summons have been issued to you. In some circumstances courts do have jurisdiction, but is can not be commented upon till you present all facts of case.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries