Keeping an employee temporary for years is exploitation: supreme court
Raman
(Querist) 21 July 2012
This query is : Resolved
Keeping an employee temporary for years is exploitation: Supreme Court
This order was given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Radha Dubey case vs Govt of NCT of delhi in which petitioner was employed for more than 10 years on contract basis and the matter is still pending before the court but has given some relief to the petitioner
If allied matters( on removal of adhoc services) are pending before the Supreme Court but differnt bench , how can such matters be brought to the same bench, so that aggrieved party be also given same relief..Kindly quote any rule/or application which can be filed before the registry of Supre Court?
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 21 July 2012
Bring a matter before the same bench is not required unless both the appellants and the respondents are same and the matter is question is also similar.
A order passed by the supreme curt is to be considered every other bench,
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 21 July 2012
Similar case with Mumbai Passport and Immigration , abt 175 persons on contract for years, to proceed issue of Passport, and their efficiency was double that of permanent staff, they worked for abt 10 years as Temporary. Try to find out, as it was before 15 years and matter handled by Adv Vashi, and I can't recollect exact facts. .
Guest
(Expert) 21 July 2012
You can find innunerable cases of long term contractual employment in every Government organisations. You may better file a PIL after obtaining data from some organisations. Since your PIL would provide broader perspective, the SC may perhaps consider hearing of the PIL as well as the existing individual case simultaneously due to involvement of similar legal implications.
JANAK RAJ VATSA
(Expert) 21 July 2012
there is no requirement for transfer of a case from one bench to another for different matter because an order by any bench is known to all other benches.
