Sold land without mutation
VARUN MAHAJAN
(Querist) 26 February 2013
This query is : Resolved
Mr X in 2008 sold a peice of land to Z which was registered with sub registrar with the court having jurisdiction after which Mr.Z got in the posession of the property and started living there. where as he fails get mutation done.
Mr X died on 2012 leaving behing 2 Son & 2Daughters.
Now childrens of Mr X has got stay for the partition amongst them where as Mr Z wants to sale that land to his freind Mr.D
I Want to know that:-
1. Will there be any restriction for getting Mutation done by Mr Z
2. If so what will be the procedure to get mutation done
3.Any other process by which the land could be sold.
Arvind Singh Chauhan
(Expert) 26 February 2013
At first Z should start mutation proceeding on the basis of registered sale deed and possession. Then he should plan to sell.
VARUN MAHAJAN
(Querist) 26 February 2013
THAT I KNOW TELL ME WHAT I DONT KNOW
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 February 2013
1.No.
2.question then does not arise.
3.If buyer agrees,the sale can be made even on the basis of the title deed.No bar to do in law.Mutation can be initiated even by buyer.
VARUN MAHAJAN
(Querist) 26 February 2013
Sir as per records stay has been imposed and when we approched the concerned authority they said due to stay iyt would not be possible to get Mutation done.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 February 2013
In that eventuality If Z is party to that suit he needs to contest the suit and to get the stay vacated.If he is not a party in the suit,then he should apply for his impleadment .
Rajeev Kumar
(Expert) 26 February 2013
Then you have to file a seperate suit in court on the basis of title.
Rajeev Kumar
(Expert) 26 February 2013
Stay have been given on the partion of property including that land among his legal heirs and not on third party right. So approach the court in this regard.
VARUN MAHAJAN
(Querist) 26 February 2013
Z is not party to that suit but due to conflict between childrens of Mr X the property from which maximum was sold and the property left is now in dispute.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 February 2013
Your last query is not intelligible to me????
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 26 February 2013
Why You people conceal things at first step of the query?
Any way you will suffer not I?
VARUN MAHAJAN
(Querist) 26 February 2013
There is nothing to conceal...
but any ways you may go through the question what I have asked. might be you could get what I was asking.
Anirudh
(Expert) 26 February 2013
Dear Mr. Prabhakar,
When Mr. Varun replied to Mr. Arvind saying "THAT I KNOW TELL ME WHAT I DONT KNOW",
I would have asked Mr. Varun to first tell what are all he knows. After knowing from him as to what all he already knows, I would have tried to tell what he does not know, if there is any such left out thing! Otherwise, i will get a nose-cut.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 04 March 2013
After clarification of many things, the query should be treated as finally resolved now as many things many people do not know.
