LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Agm date

(Querist) 18 March 2013 This query is : Resolved 
Due to typographical error agm date was mention 30/09/2012 and no scope for rectification at the time of filing in mca.

Now notice have been received fom roc for which reply have been given stating there was mitake due to above stated reason with board and agm minutes .

Even then notice have been received from court.


Please advise
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 18 March 2013
This is a minor issue. Bring to the notice of the court about the typing error.
Adv k . mahesh (Expert) 18 March 2013
file amendment form
R.K Nanda (Expert) 18 March 2013
no more to add.
Sankaranarayanan (Expert) 18 March 2013
file the ammendment form along with the reason of mistake . and reply
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 18 March 2013
Typographic error which already stands cleared against the receipt of the notice do not provide cause of action to RO to file any petition before the court so put the reply before the court strongly with other documentary evidence.
ajay sethi (Expert) 18 March 2013
agree with experts


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now