Bail
GANGO PADHYAYA
(Querist) 03 June 2013
This query is : Resolved
MY petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 406, 407, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, in connection with CRIME Case No. 24/2011.
CRIME REGISTERED ON 11-02-2011
I find that the petitioner was the informant in the case and the documents have been brought on record to show that the petitioner had acted upon the direction issued by the Superintending Engineer, Road Construction
Department. It also appears that the other MAIN Accused persons have been granted bail / anticipatory bail. ON 10-03-2011
NOW MY PETITIONERS ARE SUB-ORDINATES TO THEIR SUPERIORS ACCORDING TO THEIR INSTRUCTIONS THEY DONE WORK
MY PETITIONERS ARRESTED ON 20--05-2013 THEY ARE STILL IN JAIL
FOR THE ABOVE SAID SECTION SECOND BAIL APPLICATION HOW CAN I CONTEST IN COURT
REGARDS
GANGO PADHYAYA
Nadeem Qureshi
(Expert) 03 June 2013
Dear Querist
when the main accused on bail/AB then file bail petition before court with the court order in which the main accused bail has been grant/AB and demand parity and also place some relavant judgments of SC/HC
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 04 June 2013
Yes, they should be enlarged on bail asap. They should rather have applied for AB than facing the risk of getting arrested which eventually happened.
