Sec 67 of limitations act
Sandeep Deshmukh
(Querist) 29 October 2015
This query is : Resolved
As per the sec 67 of limitation act, when landlord determined the tenancy of tenant, he must file suit of recovery within 12 years, if not suit will be bared by limitation and will be liable to be dismissed. In such condition what will be the legal position? is this means that tenant acquire title by adverse possession, but many citation says that mere notice of termination of tenancy is not sufficient to prove adverse possession. What remedies available to the landlord in such condition. Please suggest.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 29 October 2015
firstly section 67 does not exist in limitation act. secondly citations not supplied.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 29 October 2015
Academic query, state actual facts, if any.
K.S.Srinivas
(Expert) 29 October 2015
I agree with the experts.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
(Expert) 29 October 2015
The tenancy can not be terminated just by issue of notice, it has to be confirmed by the court and hence there is no provision as such as you presume in limitation act.
There will not be any adverse possession in your circumstances but if rent is not paid,other illegalities or property is sub let than you get the right to get is vacated but through court procedure.
You will need an advocate who had handled such matters , others will be of no help.
