Interview frods
Sachin
(Querist) 11 September 2016
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
I have cleared an employment exam of Survey of India in the year 2015. But, after interview in final selection list they have added a name where his name was not shortlisted for interview. Subsequently, I went through RTI but in final, I am not getting what action I need to take, as I am week by financially I didn't decided that whether I should file a case or not.
Kindly find attached RTI replies from the department for my queries and suggest me the right path sir please.
Thanking you ..,
I cant upload the documents ...
Ms.Usha Kapoor
(Expert) 12 September 2016
You First issue a Legal notice to survey of India and then approach CAT for considering your candidature for the said post in question and you've been subjected to injustice etc.Produce all the RTI replies you've got as evidence in CAT.Certainly you'd be rendered justice.
adv.bharat @ PUNE
(Expert) 12 September 2016
U can make appeal to the appellant authority for no reply with in required time frame.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 12 September 2016
Write to Survey of India.
They may act.
Thereafter you can move court.
N.K.Assumi
(Expert) 12 September 2016
Any appointment has been made or not based on the modified select list. Please also note that select list does not confer right to appointment.
Guest
(Expert) 12 September 2016
Mr. Sachin,
You stated, "Subsequently, I went through RTI," but you have not mentioned, what information did you get through RTI?
Please be clear in your discussion.
Also, can you clarify, how addition of a person in the short list could affect you in interview?
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
Sir,
I have uploaded RTI replies received from Survey Of India in below mentioned Google Drive Link.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B152MKZavXf4NVVwS2RvUTdTXzA
Kindly please look into above said documents and suggest me the way sir...
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 12 September 2016
What is not satisfactory in reply received thru RTI!
Guest
(Expert) 12 September 2016
Not concerned with any other link. You may better reproduce the replies here on this page.
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
Sir,
my 1st RTI application
Application for Information under RTI Act 2005
1. Name of the Applicant: Sacheen P Kattimani.
2. Address of the applicant: Aluvimasjid Road, Near: Jain Temple, Mullakshi, Bijapur 586101
Karnataka State
3. Details of information sought:This is regarding the announcement of result of TTT ‘A’ Recruitment published vide final list dated 27.05.2015.
[a] Sri Raghavendra Rathod [Roll No 3409] has been selected at Serial Number 2 under SC Category in the recruitment result published on 27.05.2015. But, his name was not there in the list of provisionally selected candidates who were interviewed on 12.05.2015. Please intimate under RTI Act, under which provisions of rule he was selected without having been interviewed.
[b] Sri Bharma Gowda SN [Roll No 3034 has been selected at Serial Number 4 under Unreserved category in the recruitment result published on 27.05.2015. But, his name was not there in the list of provisionally selected candidates who were interviewed on 12.05.2015. Please intimate under RTI Act, under which provisions of rule he was selected without having been interviewed.
[c] Kindly furnish under RTI Act, the copy of office order passed by the competent authority for dropping my name [Sacheen P Kattimani [Roll No 3420]] through I was interviewed and my name was included in the Reserved List.
[ d] Under which provisions of rule my name was dropped and in my place Sri Raghavendra Rathod was selected though his name was not in the list of candidates selected for attending interview held on 12.05.2015.
[e] Please furnish information under RTI Act, the details of marks secured by me and by Sri Raghavendra Rathod in various stages of selection process.
Details of RTI Fees Paid: Rs.10 IPO enclosed.
Mode of Reply sought: By Registered Post
Name of the CPIO from whom the information is sought: M Mohan, Major General, Additional SG SZ & Director, KGDC, Chairman, Karnataka Geo Spatial Data Centre, Post Box No 3403, Sarjapur Road, Koramangala II Block, Bangalore 560 034.
Place: Bijapur, 2.6.15 Signature of the applicant
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
Reply messages are not copying as they are in Image format and I cant paste it here also ..
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 12 September 2016
The concerned official seems to have explained that SC candidates were give weight-age and numbers are also given.
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
Yes exactly sir .. they have said I got less marks to compare to him and they have given list of selected candidates for interview .
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
2nd RTI application from my side
From: by Registered AD
Sacheen P Kattimani
Aluvimasjid Road
Near: Jain Temple
Mullakshi
Bijapur 586 101
To
The Director
Survey of India
Karnataka Geo-Spatial Data Centre
Post Box No. 3403
Sarjapur Road
Koramangala II Block
Bengaluru 560 034
Respected Sir,
Sub: Complaint against the injustice caused to me in the selection
process for the post of Geo TTT A in Survey of India, Karnataka
Geo Spatial Data Centre, Bangalore during 2015.
-------
I have applied for the above mentioned post and was qualified for Stereo Fusion Test and Interview to be held on 12.05.2015 at serial number 24 of the list [My Roll Number is 3420]. I belong to Scheduled Caste.
Accordingly, I have also successfully completed the interview. But, when the final selection list was published, I was shocked to know that one Sri Raghavendra Rathod whose name was not there in the list of provisionally selected candidates to be interviewed on 12.05.2015 was selected for the post. Then, I submitted one RTI Application dated 02.06.2015. In reply to RTI Query, your office has replied that the name of Sri Raghavendra Rathod was not there in the list of provisionally selected candidates to be interviewed on 12.05.2015 since 5% relaxation in the cut-off for SC/ST candidates was not given at that time and as pointed out by SC/ST Member of Recruitment Board, 5% relaxation in the Cut Off Marks was given to SC/ST candidates and hence additional five candidates were called for the interview on 27.05.2015. Your office has also stated that Sri Raghavendra Rathod is one among the five candidates called for interview on 27.05.2015.
Thus, in the whole case, the following injustices are caused to me.
[a] I also belong to SC Community. Hence, I am also eligible for 5% relaxation in the cut-off. But, I have been kept in dark and I have not been informed whether this relaxation is given to me or not.
[b] As per RTI Reply, Sri Raghavendra Rathod [Roll No. 3409] has secured 127 Marks and I have secured 122 marks in Main Test and Interview. In screening test also he secured 50 Marks where as I secured 35 Marks. Thus, the Marks Secured by Sri Raghavendra Rathod was more. If this is the actual fact, then how his name was left out from the list of candidates to be interviewed on 12.05.2015. This is not clarified by your office.
[c] The rule of giving 5% relaxation to the SC/ST candidates is universal and it should have been known to the Chairman and Members of Recruitment Board. But, as admitted by the CPIO of your office, the rule came in to picture only when it was pointed out by the SC/ST Member of the Recruitment Board. Till then, the whole process was carried out without taking into account this important rule. If this relaxation was initially given, then Sri Raghavendra Rathod would have also attended the interview on 12.05.2015 and question of conducting separate interview for him on 27.05.2015 would not have arose and the injustice would not have been caused to me. But, the Recruitment Board has over looked the rule and caused injustice to me.
[d] If the 5% relaxation was initially given to all SC/ST candidates, then myself and Sri Raghavendra Rathod both would have attended the interview on 12.05.2015 and both of us would have been selected and the name of some other SC candidate who secured lesser marks than us would have been deleted. In the interview I have secured 36 Marks, where as Sri Raghavendra Rathod has secured 30 Marks. It means I was having all chances of being selected being better performer in the interview. But, due to dropping of name of Sri Raghavendra Rathod at the initial stage and due to adding of his name at subsequent stage, the damage has been caused to the candidates who were interviewed on 12.05.2015.
The above narrated facts clearly show that injustice has been caused to me though I came out successful in all the stages of recruitment process. Therefore, by considering the above facts, the final selection list may please be prepared afresh. I hope that justice will be given to me and if the above facts are not considered, I am inclined to approach the judicial forum to seek the justice. By submitting this representation to you, I have deemed to have availed all channels of representation and now I can approach the judicial forum to seek the justice if my this representation is not disposed of by you within reasonable period of time.
With regards, Yours faithfully,
Place: Bijapur
Date: 14.07.2015 [Sacheen P. Kattimani]
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 12 September 2016
It is a voluminous exercise.
Sit with your own counsel.
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
lastly, they have replied you can come and check to our records at any time
Sachin
(Querist) 12 September 2016
Sir,
please let me know, what course of action should i need to take ??
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 12 September 2016
In the given facts, you need to check the record in person and decide future course of action thereafter. As you have not been denied to supply the desired information and department is further ready to show you entire record so now its your turn to use the information before the appropriate forum.
Guest
(Expert) 13 September 2016
Dear Sachin,
You may better check their record, but go only after you are fully equipped with knowledge about rules of concessions to the S/c & S/T candidates.
Kumar Doab
(Expert) 13 September 2016
You can check the record.
You may prefer to get merits examined by a very able counsel before you move court.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 21 September 2016
Full case file need to be shown to local senior lawyer expert in service matters for guidance.
