Estoppel on record

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 18 August 2020 This query is : Resolved
THE DEFENDANT FRAUDULENTLY PARTITIONED PROPERTY AMONG SOME NAMES OF OCCUPANTS WRONGLY LISTED BESIDES THE NAMES OF TRUE CO-OWNERS BY MISREPRESENTING ONE OF THE OCCUPANT WRONGLY RECORDED. THE TRUE CO-OWNERS WERE DECEASED AND NOTICES WERE ADDRESSED TO THE DECEASED THEREFORE NONE APPEARED BEFORE THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND THE DEFENDANT GOT EXPART ORDER. LATER THE CAUSE OF ACTION TOOK PLACE WHEN THE DEFENDANT STARTED ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION IN THE PART PARTITONED BY HIM. I FILED A CIVIL SUIT. NOW THE DEFENDANT PRODUCED AN OLD DEED OF SALE CLAIMING HIS PROPERTY IS THE SUIT PROPERTY. IN THE COURT OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR HE CLAIMED TO BE A CO-OWNER AMONG OTHER CO-OWNERS AND EQUALLY PARTITIONED A SHARE INSTEAD OF DEMARCATING THE PROPERTY. BUT BECAUSE THE PROPERTY DOCUMENT IS DEFECTIVE AND COULD BE REJECTED THE DEFENDANT PREFERRED PARTITION. IS THE DEFENDANT NOW ESTOPPED DENYING PARTITION AMONG OTHER CO-OWNERS? IF THIS PLEA WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THE PLAINT CAN IT BE RAISED IN THE ARGUMENT? OR WILL AMENDMENT BE NEEDED. THE CASE IS AT THE STAGE OF CROSS EXAMINATION. I HAVE A RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY AND I AM THE PLAINTIFF. THANKS FOR YOUR ADVICE.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 18 August 2020
Mr./ Ms Anonymous,
What is your locus standi / concern to the post ?

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 18 August 2020
All related papers / case file need to be referred for forming any opinion, or rewrite clear material facts with clear query.

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 20 August 2020
Be brief and specific for forming proper opinion and oblige.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries