Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 09 July 2011
This query is : Resolved
Dear sir, As after much thinking n discuss,I had to file an ISTGASSA u/s 420&406 for excess jewellery taken by wife illegally beyond FIR u/s 498A.she promised to return and come back but my all waiting and efforts in vain and she demands huge undue money.the ISTAGASSA sent to PS and 9 days lapsed but Police not booked.Is there maybe a legal ground of not booking FIR. 1-As police taken away all jwellery from my home city A and wife taken away the same giving her receipt from PS city B. 2- I filed 420&406 after 2 yrs of happening the event in city A. -any jurisdiction issue may emerge for not booking. my advocate says nothing implication of these 2 points as I asked before filing 420&406. Pls advise me.shall be highly grateful. Thanks.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 10 July 2011
Dear sir/Madam, thanks! but quarry unresolved is- Any jurisdiction implication as police taken away from my home city A and wife taken away city B where she filed case. I filed 420 n 406 in my home city A. wife accompanying with Police while taking away by police is must for filing case in city A. pls tell, shall be grateful. Thanks with regards.
SAANJAAY GUPTAA
(Expert) 10 July 2011
yes, your case is maintenable as the jurisdiction is concerned.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 11 July 2011
Dear sir, sorry!I got not clearly understood.should i say in statement before police that wife was also present at the time of police taken away for only purpose of filing the case in my home city A. is wife's presence with police at the time of search & seizure comulsory for the purpose,pls tell me the answer of question in only yes or not. thanks with regards
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup