Please help
Asha
(Querist) 15 January 2012
This query is : Resolved
Hello Everybudy.,
I need draft of Board Resolution in respect of re-issue of share certificate as per Rule 4(2) of the Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules, 1960.
Rule 4(2)
No certificate of any share or shares shall be issued either in exchange for those which are sub-divided or consolidated or in replacement of those which are defaced, torn or old decrepit, worn-out, or where the cases in the reverse for recording transfers have been duly utilized, unless the certificate in lieu of which it is issued is surrendered to the company :
Provided that the company may charge such fee, if any, not exceeding Rs. 2 per certificate issued on splitting or consolidation of share certificates or in replacement of share certificates that are defaced or torn, as the Board thinks fit
As far I understood, there is two requirements in this regard:-
One is bring back Old Share Certificates and other is Board Resolution.
If there is any other requirement, please do mention here.
Please reply here soon..
Thanks
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 15 January 2012
Board resolution shall followed by bring back old share certificate shall suffice in the given matter.
No specific performa is available as the same is to be passed in simple language as per requirement.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 16 January 2012
yes sir.. already i told earlier itself that this author's picture is cute..
but her query always irrelevant to this site.,
she can use caclubindia
-tom-
Deepak Nair
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Perhaps Tom is planning for a Mutta Roast.
In the present query, the querist need the guidance of a CS and not an advocate.
She have been posting such queries regularly.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 16 January 2012
We may be able to give an answer to the query or not.
We may consider that the query does not pertain to this Forum, or if we do not want to provide any ready made format, then we may say so.
But, I will not consider it appropriate to ridicule the querist in any manner. In the process, we will be unwittingly lowering the status of this forum itself in the eyes of the querists.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 16 January 2012
JUST A SAMPLE OF THIS AUTHOR'S VAGUE QUERIES..
Do reply sir
author : Asha
PRO CHAT CALL
Posted 23 days ago
Could some1 pls post d link to xml to pdf converter for ay11-12..its really urgent.
-tom-
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 16 January 2012
One can simply ignore such query. Not necessary that we have to answer everything.
Sailesh Kumar Shah
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Take professional services of company secretary.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Dear Mr. Tom,
I appreciate your position.
Mine is only a simple feeling and suggestion. It is not FATWA (a dictat to be obeyed unquestioningly).
One may agree or one may disagree and ignore. That is perfectly ok with me.
I do not remain in a place (FORUM) the moment I consider that it has lost its status! Because, in that case I would like to protect my status, even if it is worth only one quarter of a penny!
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Law is logic so there can never be last word in law or legal system.
This site is only an initial effort, people get benefit or not is just presumption since other than students I have not seen any input after getting results from efforts on this or any other site.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 16 January 2012
and thank you arunagiri sir., and my friend deepak., i like your comments on me..
always we no need to be professional. some time we may be fun. nothing wrong.
-tom-
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Mr.Tom,
You are part of this team. What ever the raise and praise you are also having it?
Dont say just because of the PRO scheme, this forum lost the dignity?
The promoters need not run this website for charity.
You have every right to comment on the scheme, Give your suggestions in improving this scheme, or suggest any other scheme.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 16 January 2012
MR.Tom,
You can have fun, before getting married. After getting married I am so sorry, I can predict, but, there is only a presumption u/s xyz (I) if the Universal Evidence Act.
If you want to know more details of that section post me PM.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 16 January 2012
continue tasteful masala,
I cant say anything in your Tax & investment query, I can only add masala to your Recipe
Deepak Nair
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Dear Shroff sir,
The recipe became a delicious dish and we ate it.
You were late. so missed.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 16 January 2012
thank you shroff sir.. am also confusing.. how its missing.. dont know..
-tom-
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Prabhakarji, not only listen music, taste the delicious dishes also. After all, after such a lot of mental work, we need recreating Dinner party with music.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 16 January 2012
Mr.Tom,
Dont worry, you have the support of the matrimonial expert, even before you get married and even before case is booked on you u/s 498A, 494 and 497 IPC.
Any how I should thank Mr.Shroff for extending the legal support to Mr.Tom.
So, Mr.Tom, prevention is better than curing. Learn the loopholes from Mr.Shroff. And post it to me as PM.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 16 January 2012
I BLESS YOU BUT FOR NUMBERS YOU NEED TO BE TAUHID AND NOT TOM!
IS NOT IT SO ? TOM!
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 16 January 2012
So, Mr.Tom, needs a criminal lawyer's advise also in addition to the matrimonial expert, because the offenses (S.302) are going to be increased, in additional to my previous u/s 498A, 494 and 497 IPC) quotes.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 16 January 2012
i will manage my cases as in person.. dont worry sir., i wont give any case to any of my advocate friend. so dont fix your house budget by my case fee..
-tom-
