Envelop empty or not
Narain chand mittal
(Querist) 05 September 2010
This query is : Resolved
one sends notice to another in an Envelop actually putting notice in it, but other side giving reply that he got empty envelop(for just buying the time or whatever may be reason). My First question is what to do in this matter, one simple answer may be "send another copy" but I want to know if there is any other answers. My second and most important question is what should a person sending notice do at the time of sending notice, so that after getting notice, if one denies, it can be proved that notice was sent in envelop and it is not an empty envelop, in another words how can it be proved that notice is actually sent and it is not an empty envelop, what to do at the time of sending notice so that even if after getting notice, it is replied that envelop in an empty one, it can be proved that it is not empty one.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 05 September 2010
If the addressee cames and states that the envelop is empty then the onus is upon him to prove that unusual thing. Once he admits of receiving a envelop, the presumption is that it contained the article as calmed by the sender.
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
(Expert) 05 September 2010
I agree with Mr Barman !
The Notice paper can be used as envelop and send it - second time - one side Notice and other side Addressee & Sender names
R.Ranganathan
(Expert) 06 September 2010
As Barman said it is on the person saying that the envelope was empty to prove it. But it is better in such circumstances to send a copy of the notice again.
