S C Judgement regarding Tribunals

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 November 2010 This query is : Resolved
Mr. Ramachandran has given following reply to some query
I have completely gone through the decision of the Supreme Court in CIVIL APPEAL NO.3067 OF 2004 titled Union of India Vs. R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association.
No where the SC has held that all Tribunals should be transferred to Ministry of Law & Justice, as wrongly mentioned by you.
All that the SC has held was as under in paragraph 56:
"(xiii) The administrative support for all Tribunals should be from the
Ministry of Law & Justice. Neither the Tribunals nor its members shall seek
or be provided with facilities from the respective sponsoring or parent
Ministries or concerned Department."
In case of DRT the administrative support is from Ministry of Finance can we give notice to Finance Ministry to susspend the functioning of DRT till the order of SC is complied with & if after our notice the DRT continue to function with administrative support from FM will it be contempt of court.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

R.Ramachandran (Expert) 12 November 2010
Dear Anonymous,
Please do not open different threads on the same subject.
Already a separate thread on this issue in http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/unconstitutional-functioning-of-DRT-129371.asp
So please revert to the above thread with your latest query, so that people who participate in the discussion would be able to appreciate your query in the proper context and provide their respective views.
I DO NOT THINK OTHER EXPERTS WILL ANSWER YOUR QUERY UNLESS YOU REVERT TO THE ORIGINAL THREAD. We have to follow some discipline.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 November 2010
I started new discussion because my query does not relates to constitutional law. My query is initiated from your valuabe reply to some earlier query but i think my subject matter is different

R.Ramachandran (Expert) 12 November 2010
No, the subject matter is the same. So please put your query in the original thread.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 November 2010
I am not an expert & not the same queriest so i can not put my message there. I request you to kindly please reply to my query

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 12 November 2010
I concur with ramchandran.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 November 2010
Dear Mr. Makkad
I am not an expert & not the same queriest so i can not put my message there. I request you to kindly reply to my query

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 November 2010
Fresh query with explanation for fresh query

R.Ramachandran (Expert) 12 November 2010
Dear Anonymous,
You say you are not an expert. Nor am I. But when asked to revert to the original thread from where you picked up the reply, you do not want to do it. Unless you revert to the thread the question of answering your query does not arise.

Parthasarathi Loganathan (Expert) 12 November 2010
Another few minutes of mine is wasted going through this thread. Mr. Anonymous will understand the issues raised by Mr.Ramu.

s.subramanian (Expert) 13 November 2010
yes.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries