Witness not needed in bribary case

Dildar Singh (Querist) 26 November 2010 This query is : Resolved
The DNA newspaper dtd 26th Nov 2010, carried an article "Witness not needed in bribary case".........a ruling given by Supreme Court (Bench comprising Justice Harjit Singh Bedi and Justice Chandramaulikar Prasad) which says "Bribe is not taken in public view and therefore there may not be any person who could see the givig or taking of the bribe....."

Could you please enlightenon this pathbreaking judgment?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

SAANJAAY GUPTAA (Expert) 27 November 2010
Please go through the Full Judgement of the Supreme Court and dont use the paper cutting for your reference.

Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 02 December 2010
The judgment was delivered on the basis of the material evidence and witness of the defacto complainant and a shadow witness who corroborated the statements of the defacto complainant.
witness not needed in the bribery case - It is not the ruling of the Apex court.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries