cross examination

ksvrajuadv (Querist) 23 December 2010 This query is : Resolved
petitioner (husband) admitted his sign in panchyat agreement,where he admitted his second marriage but denied the contents of agreement.what is the relevancy of his admission ?

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 23 December 2010
Document as a whole shall be read in evidence and such evidence shall be used against him until and unless he proves it otherwise on the basis of strong documentary evidence.

Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 23 December 2010
Only after the due proof of the contents of the document and his signature, such admission would be taken into account.

s.subramanian (Expert) 24 December 2010
Mere admission of his signature will not impute him with the knowledge of the contents of the document. You have to prove that he signed the document after knowing the contents only.

Satyendra Kumar Pandey (Expert) 24 December 2010
Agreed with the view of Mr. S.Subramanian, document can be proved in whole (contents and signature) mere acceptance of signature on any document is not impute that the signer have knowledge of the contents o the document.

Arun Kumar Bhagat (Expert) 01 January 2011
Only the signature is admissible not the contents. Second marriage is not admitted in given circumstances.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries