ABOUT CMA
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 28 April 2011
This query is : Resolved
Sir,
The petitionet who has put in a CMA in 3rd addl. chief judge has at first got a stay from the court of Junior civil Judge regarding demolishing of an unauthorized and illegal structure made by him. The municipal corporation also rejected his application for regularizastion on the grounds that it does not satisfy the rules in force.
Even before he has approached the Junior Civil Judge there is a case pending on the unauthorized structure in the High Court and there is also a contempt case pending against the pettioner and the municipal corporation as the pettioner did not adhere to the orders of the High Court 'to stay construction pending disposal of the suit'.
The pettioner in the OS filed before the Junior Civil Judge hid the fact that the case is pending in the High Court and the standing counsel of the corporation got it dismissed on this ground.
The pettioner then went and approached the 3rd Addl. Chief Judge and obtained a status quo against the corporation.
Whenever the case comes up for hearing the pettioners counsel gets it posted to a latter date.
Now the pettioner has taken this line of approach that he is an dialysis patient and he would like some more time to post the hearing.
How can a dialysis patient (from January 2008 as certified by their doctor) can keep the case pendingon this ground.
