Whether review petition is mainataibale at delhi high court?

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 01 October 2011 This query is : Resolved
I have filed the writ petition before High Court and which was dismissed as following:

"The petitioner calls in question the legal propriety of the orders
dated 8th February, 2011 in O.A. No.xxxxx and 12th June, 2011 in
R.A. No xxxx passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal
Bench (for short, ?the tribunal?), whereby the tribunal has declined to
interfere on the selection and appointment in respect of the post of
Technical Assistant in xxxx completed in 2001 on the ground of
limitation and further declined to entertain the review application.
Having heard the petitioner in person, we are of the considered opinion
that selection and appointment could not have been challenged after a
span of eight years. It is also noticeable that none of the selectees
were arrayed as a party.

Judged from both the spectrums, we do not find any infirmity in the
order of the tribunal and accordingly it is affirmed."

The factual point was that merits of the case was already been decided by its previous order of CAT dated 24.06.2010 and has gone in my favor which was remanded back to CAT by the writ petition filed by the Respondent and above orders had gone aginst me which I has challenged and dismmised by HC..
I have been challenging the arbitrary act of the Respondent for denial of the vacancy which had been created when the panel was in vogue. There is no one becuase the vacny was not filled but The HC has not considered my point and mistakenly understood that I have been challenging the selection process without making any one party

Looking from above circumstances whether it is advisable to file Review Petition or should file SLP before Supreme Court

Follow Query

Report Abuse