Do i have locus standi ??
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 25 November 2011
This query is : Resolved
Suppose I am Umang Arora in this Case and wanna file an appeal against this appeal,should I file appeal in some other Court or should I file an application in this Court, whether I have some Locus Standi or not as now even the Defendant No. 15 is not with me.But mine objections are that defendant No. 15 gotten the benefit on our behalf, if the deal was not going to be given to us then why we were called even to place our bid as higher buyer.
O R D E R
09.11.2011
At the request of the parties, by order dated 03.02.2010 the matter
was referred to Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The
interim report of the learned Mediator was received and it was recorded
in the order dated 26.10.2010 that the parties had amicably resolved all
the disputes. Some more time was sought by the parties from the Court to
work out the modalities of the partition of the suit property.
In the order dated 02.02.2011, it was also recorded that the parties
had resolved their disputes regarding their shares. The proposed
purchaser Sanjay Malhotra of the suit property was present before Court
along with his counsel Mr G.P. Thareja on 11.05.2011. The directions
were also issued to the parties to the effect that the suit property can
also be mutated and converted from leasehold to freehold and the parties
may jointly sell the property to Sanjay Malhotra. The matter was
adjourned to 19.08.2011. On 19.08.2011, it was recorded that out of all
parties, fourteen parties had signed the agreement to sell barring
defendants 9 and 15. It appears that later on both the defendant No.9
had signed the agreement to sell.
The defendant No.15 sought one month?s time to look for another
buyer who was willing to give a higher price of the suit property, he
also made a statement before the Court that in case he was unable to
bring a purchaser for a higher price, he will sign the necessary
papers/documents.
On 10.10.2011, further time was sought by the defendant No.15 in
this regard and the same was adjourned for today. When the matter is
taken up today, the defendant No.15 has brought a buyer, namely, Umang
Arora, who is prepared to buy the suit property bearing No.E-28, Moti
Nagar, New Delhi, on a higher price as quoted by the other parties. The
defendant No.15 has also deposited the cost of Rs.2500/- with the Delhi
High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
The proposed buyer Mr Umang Arora makes a statement before the Court that he is prepared to purchase the suit property on the higher price.
However, he is not prepared to deposit the entire amount and he will only
deposit 10% of the total sale consideration as advance amount. The
remaining amount will be paid by him at the time of executing the sale
deed. On the other hand, the other fifteen co-sharers of the suit
property are agreeable that the earlier buyer Mr Sanjay Malhotra may
purchase the property as they have already received advance amount for
the same so as the defendant No.15 and they have already executed the
agreement to sell dated 30.07.2011. Mr Thareja, the learned counsel for
the earlier buyer Mr Sanjay Malhotra, is agreeable that the share of the
defendant No.15 shall be paid as per the higher price, as quoted by the
new buyer Mr Umang Arora, by way of cheque/bank draft on the next date of
hearing. The other parties are also agreeable with the suggestion
given by Mr G.P. Thareja. Under these circumstances, a request was made
by all the parties to defendant No.15 to sign the agreement to sell. The
learned counsel appearing on his behalf seeks some time to discuss the
issue with him.
List on 16.11.2011.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 25 November 2011
You can file application before the same court as you have been defrauded in the court proceeding by defendant no. 15 who used you and later on turned hostile. You have locus standi to save your right therein.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 26 November 2011
Thnx a lot Mr. Raj Kumar, that answer may really be helpful. I am expecting some more suggestions,would be deeply obliged.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 26 November 2011
Make your query more abridged for better response.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 26 November 2011
Mr, Barman, I know brevity is soul of wit, but some times it is very difficult to make the things brief, I know that you are a witty person, so please find time and go through the whole post and guide,expecting guidance from from you........
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 27 November 2011
tom. advocate, with due respect i wanna express that read the query first carefully and you will understand the problem also....
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 27 November 2011
I am with author of this query. The query itself is very clear and a person of prudent mind can easily understand its meaning and now it depends upon the experts to properly reply it or not.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 27 November 2011
am understood your query. no problem to me.,
but you are showing rude with mr.barman., so only am asking like that., thats all.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 27 November 2011
I wrote to Mr. Burman,"I know that you are a witty person".
Does this show my rudeness?
Dear me , I am a fan of mr. Burman, he is a great helper to one and all,how can be rude to him,even if I did perform rude,i am sorry..
It is requests to you and all that if you have the query please help me with your answers...
