How to object anticipatory bail?
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
This query is : Resolved
Can someone help me on how to object anticipatory bail?
This is regarding a police case in which the culprit is trying to take anticipatory bail and we would like to object on a strong ground.
How do I know when and in which court the party will appear for the bail?
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 19 November 2014
How many queries do you have in your sleeves?
Everyday you come up with one query or the other?
Are you an advocate?
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
No, I am fighting 498a with extremely influenced and rich wife's family. Please help with this.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 19 November 2014
If you are accused in this case then why are you opposing the bail??
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
They don't have any evidence so in order to get something, they did some fraud which backfired (see my other post) and culprit found to be connected with them.
For some "strange" reason, police chose to not arrest them. Today came to my knowledge that police appears to gave them time to obtain anticipatory bail. I know this is frustrating but I have to fight.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 19 November 2014
Do not make new post if you have already posted on this .
Carry on the earlier thread.
You can oppose the bail prayer. Seek help of a lawyer who will guide you.
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
This particular question is different.
1) Can you tell me how would I know when the bail hearing will take place?
2) If you do not like to answer, please let other experts answer - thanks for your help so far. This forum is for the help and I can have infinite question in my sleeve. If you have issues, please ignore them.
3) I might or might not hire lawyer as I am financially constraint at this moment.
Thank you
Guest
(Expert) 19 November 2014
You will have to hire an advocate, who should be sufficiently capable to help you.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 19 November 2014
Sorry, this place is not for wasting out time by ' infinite and mindless' queries of yours.
This conduct makes you vulnerable for not getting any reply at all in future.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 19 November 2014
Sorry, this place is not for wasting our time by ' infinite and mindless' and repetitive queries of yours.
This conduct makes you vulnerable for not getting any reply at all in future.
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
Mind your language barman. If you do not know the answer, keep shut.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 19 November 2014
The author has finally shown his colour and he better be boycotted by experts here.
It is now at anybody's guess as to why he is at the receiving end.
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
Mr Barman, i am puzzled, why are you wasting my and everyone's time, you really so jobless and desperate for clients? Just because i said i won't hire you or any lawyer? Get a life and shut up. This forum is people to seek help and experts to share their knowledge, not soliciting for client. In my future post, i will always mention that people like you need not respond. Please note again, i don't need your service duo please shut up
Jeevan
(Querist) 19 November 2014
I feel it's best to close this thread due to above discussion which went out of context.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 20 November 2014
The admin may look into this issue immediately as the author has insulted an expert by not only his rude behavior but also using derogatory words and I request other experts to boycott and ignore this author's all queries in future.
Advocate. Arunagiri
(Expert) 20 November 2014
Mr.Jeevan,
Mr.Barman is having liberty to express his opinion, he had not insulted you, he had not used any derogatory words against you.
But, you are insulting him. Do you think this is the way you talk to an expert in the public forum.
You should apologize for this act towards my colleague.
Once you apologize, I am ready to give my opinion on your thread / query.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 20 November 2014
Thank you for your support Mr Kalaiselvan and Mr. Arunagiri.
Unless we keep an united against the abusive authors like this one, they would often insult us future and still would manage to get reply from others.
Jeevan
(Querist) 20 November 2014
There is quote from Bible, "The one who has knowledge uses words with restraint, and whoever has understanding is even-tempered" - none of seems to be the case with Barman.
It's unfortunately that Mr T. Kalaiselvan and Mr Arunagiri tried to take a biased view. So let me explain and let them, other people and admin decides who is rude, arrogant and unethical to the profession:
1) If you see the thread, the first answer by Barman was irrelevant and the rude. However, I ignored the rudeness and patiently replied to all his queries in hope to get an answer. However, it seems Mr Barman didn't had enough knowledge to answer so instead of staying aside, he called my query 'mindless'. Who is being rude & insulting here?
2) This is not the first time he used such words. I'd say Barman has no control over insulting words he uses in a public forum. In another query (http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/498a-appeal-against-acquittal--507936.asp), he used similar words when he had no knowledge to answer. Despite of that experience, I continue to provide answer in this query to him. I tried to give respect but returned with his abusing words 'mindless' and bad tones.
3) This is a public forum and I have a right to answer infinite questions. The forum is meant for that. If he does not know the answer, he don't have to contribute however being added to expert doesn't give him any rights to call my queries mindless. And this is a universal fact, if you insult others, you don't expect respect either.
4) And you can see from his last how unethical and defensive his behavior is.
I hope that this explains and clarifies my stand.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 20 November 2014
Agree with the views of expert T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate and Advocate. Arunagiri ji.
Guest
(Expert) 20 November 2014
Mr. Jeevan,
A great quote, indeed! But, you have quoted only one part of the quote by ignoring the other part of the quote, which says, “even fools are thought wise if they keep silent, and discerning if they hold their tongues.” So, why, as per Bible, you can’t think them as wise persons, who prefer to be silent to offer any advice on your vague and baseless, query that has nothing to do with your problem. For your information, these are not the words of Lord Christ. These quotes are taken from various preachers. Even these quotes go on changing from vesrion to version. The revised version in one of the edition of Bible is "One who spares words is knowledgeable; one who is cool in spirit has understanding. Even fools who keep silent are considered wise; when they close their lips, they are deemed intelligent." Since you don't seem to have understanding, you can't be considered as "cool in spirit".
However, your statements in your latest post, in themselves, need to be thoroughly analysed in what sense you have stated and what the reality can be about yourself also.
You have stated (1) "there is quote from Bible, 'The one who has knowledge uses words with restraint, and whoever has understanding is even-tempered' - none of seems to be the case with Barman," (2) that the "first answer by Barman was irrelevant and the rude," (3) "I'd say Barman has no control over insulting words he uses in a public forum" (4) Mr Barman didn't had enough knowledge to answer," (5) "It's unfortunately that Mr T. Kalaiselvan and Mr Arunagiri tried to take a biased view," (6) "this is a public forum and I have a right to answer infinite questions," etc.
From the aforesaid statements it reveals, you probably think yourself to be not only the judge of your own case but also seem to be conducting trial against the experts and then pronouncing your judgment also against them.
When you have put forth the quote of the Bible, "The one who has knowledge uses words with restraint, and whoever has understanding is even-tempered," I am reminded of a proverb, "Beggars are not choosers." They can't force others to give alms to them and that too up to the extent and according to their own wishes. Alms depend upon the sweet will of the giver only.
Similarly, in this charity forum, as a free beneficiary, you can't force anyone to give reply of your own choice. That is why I suggested earlier "You will have to hire an advocate, who should be sufficiently capable to help you,” i.e., according to your wishful needs. Irrespective of whether that be helpful to you or not, at least you would be able to get satisfaction in getting replies of your choice from some hired lawyer. You should have appreciated that LCI is such a forum where you can expect unbiased opinion of the experts, as they are giving you voluntary service, not hired by any of your opponent or enemy. About your statement, "this is a public forum and I have a right to answer infinite questions," you are mistaken, as a free beneficiary you can't exert any right. Needless to emphasize, it is only due to the goodwill of the administrators of this website, who spend a lot of money and time to maintain this site that you have got the privilege (NOT a right) to post your problem to get the help of experts, who volunteer to give a free service to you to solve your problem. Contrarily, you want the help of the experts to create problems for others just to help you to take your revenge from others. So, why should they be obliged to help you to dig grave for others?
You must remember, a knowledge seeker should always be a humble man, not arrogant or egoistic, like you have shown yourself through your latest post. You may or may not know for what purpose the quote would have been made part of the foreign epic (Bible) by the author, but I am sure you won't be aware of the incidence pertaining to your own country’s (Indian) epic "Ramayana," when even Ravana, on death bed, did not open his mouth to utter even a single word of advice for Lakshman, who went to him at the behest of Lord Rama to get some valuable advice, as Ravana was thought to be the most knowledgeable person of that time. The reason for his silence was, neither his ego, nor arrogance, nor enmity with Rama/Laksmana, but was a question of ethics, culture and attitude of the learner, Laksmana, as he sat near the head of Ravana with his egoistic thought of being his winner. But when he went again and sat before his feet on the advice of Lord Rama, only then Ravana gave him some pieces of his valuable advice. In fact, when he went to him as a learner, Lakshman's attitude should have been like a disciple, whose place is before the feet of his Guru.
But, you seem to have desire to sit over the heads of experts and also want they should feel obliged by giving their valuable advice for free.
Contrarily, you also want advice of the experts without sharing any fact and background of the case. You also want them to help you how you should be able to harm others, as if they are your paid servants.
Can you make it clear, when presently you don't have any problem to face, why the experts should be obliged to help you to harm others just to serve your selfish motive, when they don't have any enmity with your opponents and enemies or are your hired lawyers?
In fact, you have been of the habit of posing several of academic type of questions and also seeking help of experts to harm others, not asking for solution for your own specific problems.
By the way would you like to share the information, against whom and for what crime of his/her you want to object anticipatory bail? Because you don't want your opponent to get anticipatory bail that cannot be the valid reason for the experts to render even an elementary advice just to become responsible to harm others for your sake. The irony is, as you stated, you don't also want to hire services of a local lawyer to advise you or fight your case. But I apprehend, you would have hired some advocate, but for your own attitude, you would have failed to get help to fulfill your wishes.
At the end, I can only say that when you have the knowledge to judge the wisdom of experts, I feel that you don’t need any advice on any of your legal issues.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 20 November 2014
LCI ADM:
PL BOYCOTT JEEVAN
HE IS FOOLING & insulting us, wasting our time.. !
If he is accused; why he oppose AB??
open lie..
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 20 November 2014
u don't need help,
YOU NEED PUNISHMENT./..
LET UR RICH WIFE ..... U.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 20 November 2014
u don't need help,
YOU NEED PUNISHMENT./..
LET UR RICH WIFE ..... U.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 20 November 2014
Thanks Dhingraji, Goyalji and Shroffji.
The abusive authors must be boycotted at all cost.
Guest
(Expert) 20 November 2014
You are welcome Barman ji.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 20 November 2014
i agree with experts . we shall not answer any queries raised by any abusive querist
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 20 November 2014
Dear experts, let us stand united in boycotting the insulting authors/abusive querists. Barman sir, we are with you.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 21 November 2014
Thanks Sethiji, Kalaiselvanji..United we stand.
