LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Increment on re-promotion

(Querist) 18 April 2017 This query is : Resolved 
I am appointed as Tax Assistant(Income Tax Department) in Chennai on 29.11.2007, and promoted as Sr. TA on 30.12.2011. I got the promotional benefit (Viz. pay fixation by granting one increment). I have been transferred to Kolkata on my own request on 08.05.2012. as per terms and conditions I have been reverted to TA (My entry cadre) and my pay was re-fixed ( Basic pay protected and grade pay reduced to 2400).
In kolkata, I was absorbed against DR quota and i have been given bottom seniority of TA grade of the year 2012.
I again promoted as TA to Sr. TA on 02.09.2013 and I was granted the promotional benefit (Viz. pay fixation by granting one increment). My query is listed below.
1)Whether I am eligible for the increment benefit on promotion in kolkata or not. If not under which rule I should be denied the increment benefit on promotion in Kolkata. If possible kindly give the relevant part of the FR.
2) Whether FR 22C (Minimum benefit of one increment on promotion)can be denied in my case.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Expert) 19 April 2017
your grade pay was bound to come down. As regards basic pay, whether notional increments in lower grade given assuming entire service as TA.
P. Venu (Expert) 19 April 2017
"I again promoted as TA to Sr. TA on 02.09.2013 and I was granted the promotional benefit (Viz. pay fixation by granting one increment)."

Admittedly, your pay has been fixed under FR 22C in the second instance as well. Then why these queries?
prashant kashyap (Querist) 19 April 2017
Because audit is objecting the increment on promotion granted know.09.2013
prashant kashyap (Querist) 19 April 2017
Because audit is objecting the increment on promotion granted know.09.2013
prashant kashyap (Querist) 19 April 2017
Because audit is objecting the increment on promotion granted on 2.09.2013
prashant kashyap (Querist) 19 April 2017
Because audit is objecting the increment on promotion granted on 2.09.2013
Adv. Yogen Kakade (Expert) 19 April 2017
I agree with the experts.
P. Venu (Expert) 19 April 2017
What are the grounds cited by the audit?
Guest (Expert) 19 April 2017
Agree with Experts
prashant kashyap (Querist) 19 April 2017
Objection quoted"it is not admissible to promotional increment on 02/09/2013, from TA to Sr.TA as he is already receiving increment for promotion"


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :