if 'Review-FC' goes in-vain, Am I debrred from 'Revision-HC'

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 11 December 2010 This query is : Resolved
Question1:
If, to my unfortunate destiny, 'Review at FC on Int Maint Order -Sec 24.' goes in-vain and doesn't yield expected outcome, Am I debrred from going for 'Revision Process' at HC laterwards for the same interim order?

Does the law say explicitly as above?

Question2:
Time Period for revision in HC?...90 days ..Am I correct?

Time Period for review in FC? ...30 days ..Am I correct?

Question3:
Is new evidence is taken/allowed to be admited in revision at HC?

Question4:
Is new evidence is taken/allowed to be admited in review at FC?

Question5:
How does the HC take it, if imputations are placed on lower courts while asking for 'revision' at HC?

Question6:
How does the FC take it, if imputations are placed on lower courts while asking for 'review' at FC?

I am really confused on this matter and running short of time also. There are many missing links and material proof which were left to be submitted during sec 24 hearing, which I would prefer to submit now.

Please help urgently.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

M/s. Y-not legal services (Expert) 23 January 2016
anonymous query can not be answered

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries